1Call to Order1min
1.1Roll CallProcedural
1.2Public Comment on Closed Session Items OnlyInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Board will limit comments to Closed Session items and will only be accepted in person.
RationaleSpeaker cards are available at the entrance and can be submitted to the secretary before the meeting begins. Alternatively, you may raise your hand prior to the start of the meeting to indicate your desire to speak.
Financial ImpactNone.
32:45Announcement of Closed Session Purpose1min
42:45Closed Session15min
4.1CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Government Code 54956.9(d)(1)
Item details
DescriptionCONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Government Code 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: 2023-01549
52:45Reconvene to Open Session at approximately 7:00 p.m.2min
5.1Roll CallProcedural
5.2Report Out on Closed Session from March 25, 2026Procedural
62:08Welcome1min
6.1Pledge of AllegianceProcedural
73:14Changes to the Agenda1min
86:09Approval of the Agenda (Action Required)1min
97:15Public Comment
9.1Labor Association CommentsInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRCTA and CSEA labor association leaders/representatives are invited to speak to the School Board on agenda and non-agenda items. Comments are limited to 3 minutes per person per topic unless otherwise noted.
107:34Approval of the Bond Program Consent Items1min
Christy Herrera (3min) — Kindergarten teacher at Hoover described the intense and unsustainable needs in her classroom of 27–28 students, urging the board to prioritize smaller class sizes and consistent instructional support across the district.
Henry Taura (3min) — Father of incoming TK student at Orion requested additional classroom space for the Play Thrive after-school program to support Mandarin immersion students and preserve cultural and linguistic heritage.
Renee Lowe (2min) — Parent of incoming TK student at Orion urged the board to approve additional classrooms for the Play Thrive after-school program, which is at capacity as the Mandarin Immersion Program grows.
Anjian Wu (3min) — Parent of incoming TK student at Orion, waitlisted for Play Thrive within 2 minutes of the application opening, asked the district to proactively expand on-campus after-school capacity to keep pace with program growth.
10.118:45Approval of Steel Casing Cost, Change Order #3 for Solar Phase 2 Project at Taft Community School with Holt Renewables (Measure T)Action (Consent)
Maria Stockton (0min) — CSEA Chapter President briefly greeted the board and deferred her time.
Brenna (online) (0min) — Thanked the board for scheduling her for upcoming presentations on critical topics.
Ms. Martinez (2min) — Second-grade bilingual teacher at Garfield warned that proposed combo classes would widen the learning gap for already-struggling students who need their teacher's full attention, and asked the board to reconsider the plan.
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Bond Program Team recommends approval of this Change Order to accommodate additional work required due to unforeseen subsurface conditions encountered during foundation drilling at the Taft site. Groundwater and unstable soils compromised the integrity of the drilled shaft excavation, making it necessary to install a permanent steel casing to stabilize the shaft and allow the foundation to be constructed in accordance with the project requirements.
RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve the steel casing cost Change Order #3 for Taft Community School.
RationaleThis Change Order is being presented for approval due to unforeseen subsurface conditions encountered during drilling operations at the Taft site. Groundwater and unstable, caving soil conditions were encountered at one of the foundation locations, which prevented the drilled shaft from reaching the required embedment depth. To stabilize the excavation and allow the foundation to be constructed to the required depth and structural requirements, the installation of a permanent steel casing was necessary. The casing provided the necessary support to prevent further soil collapse and groundwater intrusion, enabling the foundation work to be completed in compliance with project specifications.
Financial Impact$39,952.63. Within budget. Budget Source: Fund 21 - Measure T
1122:07Bond Program Action Items
12School/Community Reports30min
12.1Information on Financial Audit Report for Redwood City School District for the 2024–25 School YearInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThis item presents the District’s 2024–25 independent financial audit, including any findings, recommendations, and corrective actions, in accordance with Education Code Section 35145. Eide Bailly LLP conducted the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, evaluating the District’s financial statements, internal controls, and compliance. The auditor will present results and respond to Board questions at the March 25, 2026 meeting (15-minute presentation; 15-minute discussion).
RationaleThe annual audit provides independent verification of the District’s financial statements and internal controls for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025. The audit includes review of financial reporting, compliance, and any identified findings or recommendations, along with the status of prior year corrective actions. District staff has reviewed the audit results and will address any findings through appropriate corrective action plans, as reflected in the audit report and accompanying management letter. The 2024–25 Financial Audit Report, prepared by Eide Bailly LLP, is attached. The auditor will present key results and answer questions at the March 25, 2026 Board meeting.
Financial ImpactThe cost of the annual audit for the year ending June 30, 2025 is $79,923 and is budgeted in the General Fund.
132:27:20Action Items (Action Required) - 1 hr 30 min
13.1Taft School Presentation and School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) ApprovalAction
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractEach school site will present key student outcome data, including suspension rates, attendance and chronic absenteeism, English Learner progress, CAASPP performance, and i-Ready growth, to provide the Board with insight into how the school is addressing student needs and improving outcomes. The presentations will highlight efforts to strengthen Tier 1 instruction, monitor student progress, and provide targeted supports for identified student groups. The School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA), required under California Education Code for schools receiving state and federal funds, is attached for Board review. The SPSA serves as a comprehensive site-level plan to improve student academic performance, with particular attention to English Learners, low-income students, and foster youth. Following each presentation and discussion, the Board will be asked to consider approval of the school’s SPSA. (15-min presentation; 15-min Board discussion)
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board of Trustees review the school presentation and the attached SPSA and approve the SPSA for Taft School.
RationaleThe purpose of the school presentations is to provide the Board of Trustees with an update on key student outcome indicators aligned with the district’s Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP). Data presented includes student suspension rates, attendance and chronic absenteeism, English Learner progress, CAASPP performance, and i-Ready growth. These updates highlight current progress and identify areas requiring continued focus, giving the Board insight into how each school is addressing student needs and working toward improved outcomes. School administrators regularly monitor indicators that reflect student engagement, access to instruction, and academic achievement.These indicators align with the California School Dashboard and the district’s strategic priorities to improve outcomes for all students, with particular attention to English Learners and other unduplicated pupil groups. Key Data Areas: Student Behavior and Suspension The district continues to implement Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) and Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) to address student behavior proactively and reduce exclusionary discipline practices. Current data includes: Suspension rates Disaggregated suspension data by student group Attendance and Chronic Absenteeism Regular attendance remains a critical factor in student academic success. School sites continue to implement strategies to improve attendance and chronic absenteeism. Current efforts include: Site-based attendance monitoring teams Collaboration with community school coordinators and family centers Targeted support for students experiencing barriers to attendance Family outreach and communication Home visits when necessary English Learner Progress Supporting English Learners remains a central priority for the district. The district continues to focus on both designated and integrated English Language Development (ELD) instruction with an emphasis on improving English Learner progress, increasing reclassification rates, as well as reducing Long Term English Learners (LTEL). Key areas of focus include: Monitoring English Learner Progress Indicator (ELPI) Implementation of designated ELD instructional blocks Continued use of Language Power supplemental curriculum Professional learning for teachers focused on integrated ELD strategies. Data presented includes English learner progress toward English language proficiency and reclassification outcomes. i-Ready Growth Data The district continues to monitor student progress through the i-Ready Diagnostic assessments administered throughout the school year. The district goal is to achieve an average of 4% annual growth in i-Ready performance. The i-Ready diagnostic provides educators with: Baseline and progress monitoring data Insight into specific skill development Opportunities for targeted instruction and intervention Data shows progress toward growth targets and helps identify areas where additional instructional focus may be required. Academic Achievement: CAASPP CAASPP data continues to serve as a key indicator of student achievement in English Language Arts and Mathematics. The district is analyzing performance trends with particular attention to English Learners and other student groups. District instructional priorities include: Strengthening Tier 1 instruction Increasing academic discourse and language development Implementation of adopted curricula with fidelity Ongoing professional learning aligned to reading comprehension and writing This analysis helps guide instructional planning and targeted support across school sites. The attached School Plans for Student Achievement (SPSAs) complement these presentations by outlining each school’s goals, actions, services, and expenditures aligned to the district’s Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) priorities and student achievement data. School site leadership teams worked collaboratively with staff, families, and community members to review student performance data and identify priority areas for improvement. The SPSA development process included: Analysis of multiple data sources, including CAASPP, i-Ready diagnostics, English Learner progress, attendance, and suspension data Identification of instructional and student support priorities aligned with district LCAP goals Development of actions and services designed to improve student outcomes Alignment of site budgets to support identified priorities Each SPSA was reviewed and approved by the school’s School Site Council (SSC) prior to submission for Board approval. Next Steps: Based on current data trends, SPSA plans continue to focus on the following areas: Strengthening Tier 1 instruction and curriculum implementation across all classrooms Expanding targeted academic support for English Learners and increasing reclassification rates Improve reading, writing, and mathematics achievement Monitoring and improving attendance, reducing chronic absenteeism, and improving student engagement Support positive student behavior and school climate through continued implementation of PBIS and MTSS supports Providing professional development aligned with the district curriculum and instructional priorities Using ongoing assessment data to guide instruction and interventions Provide targeted academic interventions and expanded learning opportunities These strategies are designed to support continuous improvement and ensure that all students have access to high-quality instruction and appropriate support to achieve academic success.
Financial ImpactFunding for SPSA actions and services is supported through a combination of LCAP resources, Title I funds, and other applicable site-based funding sources. Expenditures outlined in each plan align with allowable uses of funds and support the district’s strategic priorities.
13.21:02:37Garfield School Presentation and School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) ApprovalAction
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractEach school site will present key student outcome data, including suspension rates, attendance and chronic absenteeism, English Learner progress, CAASPP performance, and i-Ready growth, to provide the Board with insight into how the school is addressing student needs and improving outcomes. The presentations will highlight efforts to strengthen Tier 1 instruction, monitor student progress, and provide targeted supports for identified student groups. The School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA), required under California Education Code for schools receiving state and federal funds, is attached for Board review. The SPSA serves as a comprehensive site-level plan to improve student academic performance, with particular attention to English Learners, low-income students, and foster youth. Following each presentation and discussion, the Board will be asked to consider approval of the school’s SPSA. (15-min presentation; 15-min Board discussion)
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board of Trustees review the school presentation and the attached SPSA and approve the SPSA for Garfield School.
RationaleThe purpose of the school presentations is to provide the Board of Trustees with an update on key student outcome indicators aligned with the district’s Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP). Data presented includes student suspension rates, attendance and chronic absenteeism, English Learner progress, CAASPP performance, and i-Ready growth. These updates highlight current progress and identify areas requiring continued focus, giving the Board insight into how each school is addressing student needs and working toward improved outcomes. School administrators regularly monitor indicators that reflect student engagement, access to instruction, and academic achievement. These indicators align with the California School Dashboard and the district’s strategic priorities to improve outcomes for all students, with particular attention to English Learners and other unduplicated pupil groups. Key Data Areas: Student Behavior and Suspension The district continues to implement Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) and Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) to address student behavior proactively and reduce exclusionary discipline practices. Current data includes: Suspension rates Disaggregated suspension data by student group Attendance and Chronic Absenteeism Regular attendance remains a critical factor in student academic success. School sites continue to implement strategies to improve attendance and chronic absenteeism. Current efforts include: Site-based attendance monitoring teams Collaboration with community school coordinators and family centers Targeted support for students experiencing barriers to attendance Family outreach and communication Home visits when necessary English Learner Progress Supporting English Learners remains a central priority for the district. The district continues to focus on both designated and integrated English Language Development (ELD) instruction with an emphasis on improving English Learner progress, increasing reclassification rates, as well as reducing Long Term English Learners (LTEL). Key areas of focus include: Monitoring English Learner Progress Indicator (ELPI) Implementation of designated ELD instructional blocks Continued use of Language Power supplemental curriculum Professional learning for teachers focused on integrated ELD strategies. Data presented includes English learner progress toward English language proficiency and reclassification outcomes. i-Ready Growth Data The district continues to monitor student progress through the i-Ready Diagnostic assessments administered throughout the school year. The district goal is to achieve an average of 4% annual growth in i-Ready performance. The i-Ready diagnostic provides educators with: Baseline and progress monitoring data Insight into specific skill development Opportunities for targeted instruction and intervention Data shows progress toward growth targets and helps identify areas where additional instructional focus may be required. Academic Achievement: CAASPP CAASPP data continues to serve as a key indicator of student achievement in English Language Arts and Mathematics. The district is analyzing performance trends with particular attention to English Learners and other student groups. District instructional priorities include: Strengthening Tier 1 instruction Increasing academic discourse and language development Implementation of adopted curricula with fidelity Ongoing professional learning aligned to reading comprehension and writing This analysis helps guide instructional planning and targeted support across school sites. The attached School Plans for Student Achievement (SPSAs) complement these presentations by outlining each school’s goals, actions, services, and expenditures aligned to the district’s Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) priorities and student achievement data. School site leadership teams worked collaboratively with staff, families, and community members to review student performance data and identify priority areas for improvement. The SPSA development process included: Analysis of multiple data sources, including CAASPP, i-Ready diagnostics, English Learner progress, attendance, and suspension data Identification of instructional and student support priorities aligned with district LCAP goals Development of actions and services designed to improve student outcomes Alignment of site budgets to support identified priorities Each SPSA was reviewed and approved by the school’s School Site Council (SSC) prior to submission for Board approval. Next Steps: Based on current data trends, SPSA plans continue to focus on the following areas: Strengthening Tier 1 instruction and curriculum implementation across all classrooms Expanding targeted academic support for English Learners and increasing reclassification rates Improve reading, writing, and mathematics achievement Monitoring and improving attendance, reducing chronic absenteeism, and improving student engagement Support positive student behavior and school climate through continued implementation of PBIS and MTSS supports Providing professional development aligned with the district curriculum and instructional priorities Using ongoing assessment data to guide instruction and interventions Provide targeted academic interventions and expanded learning opportunities These strategies are designed to support continuous improvement and ensure that all students have access to high-quality instruction and appropriate support to achieve academic success.
Financial ImpactFunding for SPSA actions and services is supported through a combination of LCAP resources, Title I funds, and other applicable site-based funding sources. Expenditures outlined in each plan align with allowable uses of funds and support the district’s strategic priorities.
13.31:47:04Approval of the 2025-26 Second Interim Budget Report for Redwood City School DistrictAction
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Second Interim Budget Report for the 2025–26 fiscal year provides an update on the district’s financial status as of January 31, 2026, including adjustments to revenues, expenditures, and fund balances. Required by Education Code Section 42130, this report follows the state’s fiscal reporting standards and continues the financial update provided in the First Interim Report approved on December 17, 2025. (15-min presentation; 15-min Board discussion)
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve the attached 2025-26 Second Interim Budget Report, with Positive Certification.
RationaleEducation Code Section 42130 requires school districts to provide two interim financial reports annually to update the governing board on fiscal status: the First Interim reflects activity through October 31, and the Second Interim reflects activity through January 31. The 2025–26 Second Interim Budget Report incorporates actual financial activity through January 31, 2026 and updated projections for revenues, expenditures, and fund balances. Based on these updated projections, the District maintains a Positive Certification and demonstrates its ability to meet financial obligations in the current and subsequent two fiscal years. General Fund revenues are projected at approximately $158.1 million and expenditures at $159.8 million, resulting in an operating deficit of approximately ($1.7 million), which is covered by available ending fund balance and consistent with planned budget assumptions. The District continues to maintain reserves above state-required minimum levels across all projection years. As a Community-Funded (Basic Aid) district, the District’s financial position continues to be primarily supported by local property tax revenues. The Second Interim reflects updated assumptions since the First Interim and provides a current assessment of the District’s financial condition, supporting ongoing fiscal oversight and transparency.
Financial ImpactGeneral Fund revenues are projected at approximately $158.1 million and expenditures at $159.8 million, resulting in an operating deficit of approximately ($1.7 million), which is covered by available ending fund balance. The District maintains reserves above state-required minimum levels in the current and projection years.
14Discussion Items15min
14.132:35Second Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 3515.21: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Drones)Discussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 3515.21: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Drones).
RationaleThis policy was discussed on January 21, 2026 as a First Reading. Paragraph 4 has been added to create regulations clarifying requirements that must be met to permit drone operations on district property. Other edits have been made in the first three paragraphs for grammar. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
152:02:55Approval of Consent Items (Action Required)1min
15.1Approval of the February 11, 2026, Regular Meeting MinutesAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the February 11 Minutes for the Regular Meeting, as submitted.
RationaleThe board meeting minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, Superintendent, and the Administration.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact.
15.2Approval of the Addendum to the Measure U Application for North Star Academy for the 2025-2026 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThese funds support schools in strengthening core academic skills, attracting and retaining quality teachers, enhancing arts and music programs, and updating classroom technology.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and approve North Star Academy’s Addendum to their 2025-2026 Measure U Application.
RationaleFor Measure U, North Star Academy was given an allotment for 2025-2026 of $134,564 and a carryover from 2024-25 of $156,298 for a total of $290,862. North Star Academy's School Site Council met on February 3, 2026, and approved its Measure U Addendum. The following amendments are proposed to North Star Academy's Measure U Plan for the 2025-2026 school year: Increase funding for After School Homework Centers from $13,500 to $21,000 to open two additional elementary classes. These programs provide structured support for scholars to complete assignments and build strong study habits. Community survey feedback indicated a strong desire for expanded after-school support, and with these additions, North Star will offer a total of eight homework support opportunities each week. Increase funding from $12,000 to $16,000 to expand staffing support (current and retired educators) for overnight field trips, ensuring student safety, supervision, and meaningful learning experiences. Increase technology funding from $5,000 to $85,000 to support device purchases and repairs, allowing North Star to begin a thoughtful and strategic replacement of its aging fleet of classroom Chromebooks. Increase Planning and Release Time funding from $23,126 to $67,924. By giving teachers protected planning time and predictable release periods, schools reduce burnout, improve instructional quality and collaboration, and signal respect for professional practice—making it easier to attract, retain, and empower highly qualified educators, which directly strengthens academic outcomes. Allot $15,000 for curriculum subscriptions to provide access to digital platforms that offer supplemental content and instructional support tools. Allot $5,000 to support positive school culture initiatives, including materials for schoolwide monthly events, incentives for academic and learning-focused competitions, and supplies to recognize students who contribute positively to our academic community. All of the members in attendance at the February 3, 2026, School Site Council meeting voted to approve the recommendations at the meeting. An updated application for Measure U funds is attached for review.
Financial ImpactPlease see the attached Addendum for details.
15.3Approval of the Measure U Addendum for Henry Ford for the 2025-26 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThese funds support schools in strengthening core academic skills, attracting and retaining quality teachers, enhancing arts and music programs, and updating classroom technology.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and approve Henry Ford's Addendum to their 2025-2026 Measure U Application.
RationaleFor Measure U, Henry Ford was given an allotment for 2025-2026 of $116,271 and a carryover from 2024-25 of $77,168 for a total of $193,439. Henry Ford's School Site Council met on 02/24/2026 and approved their Measure U Addendum. The following are amendments proposed for the 2025-26 Measure U for Henry Ford: Increase allocation for Mental Health from $20,543 to $30,292 Change funding source of $5,728 for Newcomer Instructional Assistant from Measure U to Title 1 Allocate $5,000 for One Life Mental Health Counseling Allocate $5,456 for Assemblies Allocate $7,500 for after-school academic support through Healthy Cities Tutoring Allocate $10,000 for stipends for after-school academic support classes Allocate $26,025 to offset the cost for MTSS TOSA(Multi-tiered Systems of Support Teacher on Special Assignment) Allocate $19,166 for technology purchases and repairs All of the members in attendance at the February 24, 2026, School Site Council meeting voted to approve the recommendations at the meeting. An updated application for Measure U funds is attached for review.
Financial ImpactPlease see the attached Addendum for details.
15.4Approval of Roy Cloud's Field Trip to Washington DC – May 18 - May 22, 2026Action (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractField trips enhance academics by connecting classroom learning to real-world experiences, deepening understanding and engagement.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve the proposed field trip to Washington DC on May 18–22nd for 8th-grade students from Roy Cloud.
RationaleThis field trip provides a valuable educational experience that aligns with the curriculum in Social Studies and supports student development in historical context, American government, and civic engagement. Students will have the opportunity to tour the Capitol, visit the Smithsonian, Colonial Williamsburg, and hear from local government officials.
Financial ImpactThis activity will be funded by: Parent donations Scholarships available for students in need
15.5Approval of Roy Cloud School Field Trip to Elks Club – June 1, 2026Action (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractField trips enhance academics by connecting classroom learning to real-world experiences, deepening understanding and engagement.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve the proposed field trip to Elks Club on June 1, 2026, for 8th-grade students from Roy Cloud School.
RationaleThe 8th Grade Promotion Pool Party is intended to recognize a significant milestone in students’ educational journey while reinforcing the school’s commitment to social-emotional development. As students prepare to transition to high school, it is important to provide opportunities that foster connection, belonging, and positive peer engagement. A structured, supervised celebratory event allows students to reflect on their middle school experience, strengthen relationships with classmates, and build a sense of closure as they move to the next stage of their education. These shared experiences contribute to a supportive school culture and promote key social-emotional competencies such as relationship-building, responsible decision-making, and community awareness. By intentionally incorporating opportunities for positive social interaction and recognition of achievement, the event supports student well-being and underscores the district’s commitment to educating the whole child while celebrating student accomplishment.
Financial ImpactThis activity will be funded by: PTO contributions Parent donations Scholarships available for students in need
15.6Approval of Personnel Changes for the 2025–2026 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractUpon Governing Board approval, the Teacher of the Visually Impaired (VI Teacher) will be increased from 0.5 FTE to 1.0 FTE.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Governing Board approve the following increase in the number of staff positions for the 2025–2026 school year.
RationaleDue to changes in staffing needs within the Special Education department, the position change below is requested for the 2025–2026 school year. Special Education Department: New - FTE (0.5) VI Teacher — effective 1/6/26 The current FTE for the district VI Teacher is 0.5 FTE. In order to effectively service the student caseload, this position needs to be increased to 1.0 FTE.
Financial ImpactApprox. $78,000 per year.
15.7Approval of the Second Amendment between Redwood City School District and Amergis Healthcare Staffing for One Additional Behavior Technicians for the School Year 2025-2026Action (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the Second Amendment for Amergis Healthcare Staffing for contracted behavioral services for the 2025-2026 school year.
RationaleTo reduce suspensions as outlined in the Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), Amergis Healthcare Staffing is contracting with RCSD to provide one additional Behavior Technician, which will increase the total number to three. The Behavior Technicians will teach new skills to students, reduce problem behaviors, collect data on student progress, and use positive reinforcement to encourage growth in areas like communication, social skills, and academic tasks. The term of this agreement is from August 13, 2025, through June 30, 2026. The previous contract was approved on August 13, 2025, for a total amount of $163,800. The first amendment approved on September 9, 2026, increased the amount for this amendment by $99,000, which brought the contract total amount to $262,800. This Second Amendment increases the amount by $17,000, which will bring the contract total amount to $279,800.
Financial ImpactThe financial impact of this Second Amendment will be $17,000, which will increase the total contract to $279,800. The funding source will be Title 1 and Unduplicated Pupil Services.
15.8Second Reading and Approval of Board Bylaw 9324: Minutes and RecordingsAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Bylaw 9324: Minutes and Recordings.
RationaleThis policy was discussed as a First Reading at the January 21, 2026, board meeting.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.9Approval of Board Policy 1330.1: Joint Use AgreementsAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 1330.1: Joint Use Agreements.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in February 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.10Approval of Board Policy 3110: Transfer of FundsAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 3110: Transfer of Funds
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in February 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.11Approval of Board Policy 3220.1: Lottery FundsAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 3220.1: Lottery Funds.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in February 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.12Approval of Board Policy 3312.2: Educational Travel Program ContractsAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 3312.2: Educational Travel Program Contracts
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in February 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.13Approval of Board Policy 3314: Payment For Goods And ServicesAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 3314: Payment For Goods And Services
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in February 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups. The administrative regulation marked copy and clean copy has been added for reference only.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.14Approval of Board Policy 3400: Management Of District Assets/AccountsAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 3400: Management Of District Assets/Accounts
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in February 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups. The administrative regulation's marked copy and clean copy have been added for reference only.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.15Approval of Board Policy 3460: Financial Reports and AccountabilityAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 3460: Financial Reports And Accountability.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in February 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups. The administrative regulation's marked copy and clean copy have been added for reference only.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.16Approval of Board Policy 3516.5: Emergency SchedulesAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 3516.5: Emergency Schedules
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in February 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.17Approval of Board Policy 7110: Facilities Master PlanAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 7110: Facilities Master Plan.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.18Approval of Board Policy 7211: Developer FeesAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 7211: Developer Fees.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups. The administrative regulation's marked copy and clean copy have been added for reference only.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.19Approval of Board Policy 1445: Response to Immigration EnforcementAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 1445: Response to Immigration Enforcement.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in February 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups. The administrative regulation's marked copy and clean copy have been added for reference only.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.20Approval of Board Policy 0500: AccountabilityAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 0500: Accountability.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy in January 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.21Approval of Board Policy 5145.3: Nondiscrimination/HarassmentAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 5145.3: Nondiscrimination/Harassment
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in January 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups. The administrative regulation's marked copy and clean copy have been added for reference only.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.22Approval of Board Policy 5145.7: Sexual HarassmentAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 5145.7: Sexual Harassment
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in January 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups. The administrative regulation's marked copy and clean copy have been added for reference only.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.23Approval of Board Policy 6115: Ceremonies And ObservancesAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 6115: Ceremonies And Observances
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Board Policy Committee meeting in January 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups. The administrative regulation's marked copy and clean copy have been added for reference only.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.24Approval of Board Policy 6141.2: Recognition Of Religious Beliefs And CustomsAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Board Policy 6141.2: Recognition Of Religious Beliefs And Customs.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at the Policy Committee meeting in January 2026. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups. The administrative regulation's marked copy and clean copy have been added for reference only.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
15.25Approval of the Application for Exemption from Required Classroom Teachers’ Salary Expenditures (Education Code 41372)Action (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRCSD did not meet the Education Code requirement to expend 60% of Current Expense of Education (CEE) on classroom teacher salaries, reporting 55.54% in 2024–25—a shortfall of 4.46% (approximately $5.7 million). This variance is driven by structural expenditure factors, including investments in student support services, rising operational costs, and restricted LCFF funding requirements. The District is requesting a waiver from the San Mateo County Office of Education due to financial hardship, as redirecting $5.7 million would significantly impact reserve levels and essential educational programs.
RecommendationIt is recommended that the Governing Board approve and certify the Application for Exemption from the Required Expenditures for Classroom Teacher Salaries and authorize submission of the associated waiver request letter for fiscal year 2024–25, pursuant to Education Code Section 41372.
RationaleEducation Code Section 41372 requires elementary school districts to expend at least 60% of their Current Expense of Education (CEE) on classroom teacher salaries. For fiscal year 2024–25, RCSD reported classroom teacher salary expenditures of 55.54% of CEE, resulting in a shortfall of 4.46%, or approximately $5.7 million, as identified in Form CEA and the District’s annual audit. The District’s inability to meet the required percentage is primarily due to structural and fiscal factors: Program and Service Expenditures Outside the Statutory Definition of Classroom Teachers A significant portion of District resources supports instructional aides, intervention staff, counselors, and other student services personnel who do not meet the statutory definition of “classroom teacher” under Education Code Section 41011 but are essential to delivering educational programs. Rising Operational and Program Costs The District continues to experience increased costs related to employer pension contributions, special education services, transportation, and other operational expenditures necessary to maintain student services, which are not included in the classroom teacher salary calculation. LCFF Programmatic Requirements RCSD receives Supplemental and Concentration funding based on its unduplicated pupil population. These funds are legally required to support targeted services for students and are frequently expended on programs and staff that are not included in the classroom teacher salary calculation. Limited One-Time Resources The District utilized limited one-time revenues to support student programs and operational needs; however, these funds are not ongoing and cannot be used to sustainably increase classroom teacher salary expenditures. Absent approval of the waiver, the District would be required to redirect approximately $5.7 million in expenditures, which would significantly impact its ability to maintain the required reserve for economic uncertainties and sustain essential educational programs. Request for Waiver In accordance with Education Code Section 41372, RCSD requests an exemption from the minimum classroom teacher compensation requirement for fiscal year 2024–25 due to financial hardship. Approval of this waiver will allow the District to maintain fiscal stability while continuing to provide high-quality educational programs and student support services.
Financial ImpactNone at this time.
15.26Approval of the Purchase of 650 Acer Chromebooks for Incoming 6th Grade Students for the 2026–2027 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractPurchasing 650 Acer Chromebooks for incoming sixth graders in the 2026–2027 school year to support equitable access to digital learning, improve engagement, and build digital literacy.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve the purchase of 650 Acer Chromebooks for all sixth graders for the 2026–2027 school year.
RationaleRedwood City School District will purchase Acer Computers for the incoming sixth-grade classes for the 2026-2027 school year. The purchase is a strategic investment that ensures equitable access to curriculum, supports digital literacy, and enhances student engagement. Below are the key reasons for this purchase: Equitable Access to Curriculum Ensures all sixth graders have access to digital instructional materials, including online textbooks, Google Classroom, and supplemental learning platforms. Supports English learners, foster youth, and low-income students by providing consistent access to technology, reducing barriers to learning. Alignment with District Initiatives Supports the implementation of Tier 1 instruction and differentiated support as part of a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS). Facilitates Integrated and Designated ELD instruction by allowing students to use language-learning platforms and digital tools. Promotes engagement with district-adopted curriculum and interventions, ensuring alignment with instructional priorities Improving Student Outcomes Increases student engagement and participation through interactive learning tools. Supports blended learning models that allow teachers to differentiate instruction. Provides opportunities for students to develop research and critical thinking skills through project-based learning. Enhancing Digital Literacy and College/Career Readiness Prepares students for future academic and career opportunities by developing proficiency in digital tools and platforms. Supports writing, collaboration, and research skills essential for middle school and beyond. Ensures students are familiar with the technology needed for state assessments and digital learning environments Integration with Existing Supports Chromebooks provide a platform for students to access intervention programs, tutoring services, and district-supported resources. Enables efficient progress monitoring through Ellevation for English Learners and other assessment tools. Cost-Effective and Sustainable Solution Acer Chromebooks offer a reliable, durable, and budget-friendly option. Cloud-based functionality reduces maintenance and software update costs. Ensures longevity and scalability to support future student cohorts Providing Chromebooks to all sixth-grade students will bridge the digital divide, enhance curriculum access, and support district-wide instructional goals. This investment aligns with our commitment to equity, academic success, and technology integration in education.
Financial Impact$323,886.06; The purchase will be funded through the AMIM Discretionary Block Grant. The Arts, Music, and Instructional Materials (AMIM) Discretionary Block Grant is a California state initiative established to provide funding to local educational agencies (LEAs) for enhancing various educational programs and addressing specific needs within schools.
15.27Approval of the Agreement between Redwood City School District and AT&T to provide Internet Connectivity to the IMC building through E-RateAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe District conducted a competitive E-Rate bidding process for internet service at the Instructional Materials Center (IMC) with support from its consultant, Infinity Communications. Two bids were received. AT&T, the current provider since 2021, was recommended based on the evaluation criteria. With the current contract expiring July 1, 2026, staff recommends continuing service with AT&T.
RecommendationThe Administration recommends that the School Board approve the continuation of internet service for the Instructional Materials Center (IMC) with AT&T.
RationaleAT&T has provided reliable internet service to the IMC since July 1, 2021, under an E-Rate agreement that included a three-year term with two optional extensions. The final extension expires July 1, 2026. To ensure compliance with E-Rate requirements and evaluate market options, the District initiated a competitive bidding process through its consultant, Infinity Communications. Following the required posting period, two bids were received. Based on the evaluation of cost and service criteria, AT&T was identified as the most responsive and cost-effective provider. Continuing with AT&T ensures uninterrupted service, maintains E-Rate eligibility, and reflects the most advantageous proposal received through the competitive process. The federal E-Rate program, administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), provides discounts to schools and libraries for eligible telecommunications and internet services. Funding is awarded based on a district’s student demographics, with RCSD qualifying for approximately an 80% discount. Participation in E-Rate requires a competitive bidding process and adherence to specific program rules to ensure cost-effective procurement.
Financial ImpactThe annual cost is $5,506.20. Over the initial three-year term, the total cost is $16,518.60. E-Rate is expected to cover approximately 80% ($13,214.88), resulting in an estimated District cost of $3,303.72 over the three-year period, equating to approximately $1,101.24 per year.
162:06:10Board and Superintendent Reports10min
172:06:59Information15min
17.11:31:42AI-Assisted Literacy and Numeracy: Current Landscape and Framework for EvaluationInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThis item is presented for information only. No Board action is requested. The purpose is to provide trustees and the superintendent with context on the current state of AI-assisted learning tools as we plan instructional priorities for 2026-27 school year. Any future steps would go through the superintendent and Education Services department.
RationaleRCSD has made meaningful progress on student achievement. Our December 2025 California School Dashboard results showed ELA scores up 11.1 points (Yellow to Green) and math up 8.6 points, while chronic absenteeism and suspensions both declined. However, equity gaps persist, particularly for homeless students and African American students. Over the past two years, the Board has invested in a range of instructional tools and programs to support literacy and numeracy, including i-Ready diagnostic assessments (K-8), Imagine Learning Illustrative Mathematics (grades 6-8), the Benchmark 2022 ELA pilot (Taft and Garfield), California Reading Literacy Project teacher training, the RCSD Cohesion Plan for instructional alignment and targeted reading PD (grades 3-5), College Advising Prep math tutoring at Kennedy and McKinley, and Multitudes dyslexia screening (K-2). In November 2025, the Board also heard a presentation on AI in education, covering how teachers are using AI for lesson plans, rubrics, differentiated instruction, and IEP drafting. The question before us is whether AI-powered adaptive learning platforms have matured to the point where they can meaningfully accelerate student progress in literacy and numeracy — particularly for students who are behind grade level. Charlie Van Norman, an ed tech specialist, will present a 10-minute overview of the current landscape and a practical framework for evaluation. Mr. Van Norman's background includes: - Creator of Super Math World, reaching over 100,000 students - Founder of MathBreakers.com, a 3D puzzle-based math platform for grades 5-8 - Founding CTO of StarCoach AI, building AI-assisted K-12 math assessment tools Mr. Van Norman will outline a four-stage approach for districts considering AI-assisted learning tools: 1. Research: Survey what other California districts have implemented, what worked, and how their experience maps to RCSD's student population and existing programs. 2. Discovery: Work with teachers to validate the approach, select vendors, and design a pilot. Success hinges on teacher buy-in and ownership throughout the process. 3. Pilot: A structured 10-12 week pilot with pre-agreed success metrics and single-threaded ownership for day-to-day execution. 4. Rollout: Scope and timeline to be determined based on pilot results.
Financial ImpactNone.
17.22:11:03Redwood City School District Review of Connect's Audit Report for FY 2024–25Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Board is asked to receive a letter detailing the District’s review and findings of Connect’s Audited Financial Report for fiscal year 2024–25 as part of its charter fiscal oversight responsibilities.
RationaleIn accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding with the District, Connect shall provide a copy of the Audited Financial Report to the District, the San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools, the State Controller’s Office, and the California Department of Education. The District is required to review the audit report as part of its fiscal oversight obligations and duty to monitor the fiscal health of the charter schools. Attached is the letter from the Redwood City School District regarding the review of and findings concerning Connect's Audit Report for fiscal year 2024–25.
Financial ImpactNone.
17.32:11:32Learning Communities for School Success Program End-of-Project InformationInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractOutcomes of the Learning Communities for School Success Programs grant.
RationaleIn November 2014, California voters approved Proposition 47 (Government Code Section 7599), the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act. Subsequent legislation (Assembly Bill 1014 and Senate Bill 527), provided the statutory language to implement the Proposition 47 grant program and established the Learning Communities for School Success Program (LCSSP), setting forth the following: Funding provided to K–12 education should be used to help build the capacity of local educational agencies (LEAs) or a consortium of LEAs to identify and implement evidence-based, non-punitive programs and practices to keep our most vulnerable pupils in school, consistent with each LEA’s Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), including, but not limited to, goals for pupil engagement and school climate. Funding available to provide resources to LEAs/consortia for establishing community schools and addressing pupil attendance problems in K–12. LEAs participating in the LCSSP grant program, whether applying as a single LEA or a member of a consortium, are to report and evaluate outcomes using multiple measures while engaging in a broader community of practice that disseminates promising and proven strategies to LEAs statewide. The goals of the LCSSP are to support evidence-based, non-punitive programs and practices aimed at keeping the state’s most vulnerable pupils in school. These programs and practices must complement and enhance the actions and services identified to meet the LEA’s goals as provided in their LCAP, regardless if the LEA is applying alone or part of a consortium. This grant was awarded to the Redwood City School District in August 2022 and ended in December 2025. LCAP Goal Key Activities Goal 1: Student Well-Being and Attendance Monitored "at-risk" students, provided direct outreach (home/school visits), offered targeted transportation, and connected students with Mental Health Services. Goal 2: Improving Outcomes for English Learners Opportunity School Teacher provided specialized tutoring for academic catch-up, grade improvement, and increased ELPAC scores. Goal 3: Boosting Academic Achievement Opportunity School Teacher proctored i-Ready exams for high-priority students to ensure robust, reflective data. LCSSP Impact and Key Results The grant had a moderate impact, primarily enhancing teacher capacity and evolving student support as well as impacting the LCAP data. Area Key Results (2024-2025) Behavior and School Climate Provided a Behavioral Support Manual and professional development on Tier 1/2 strategies (like PBIS), leading to fewer office referrals and suspendable offenses. A strategic shift to preventative on-site support in 2024/2025 resulted in zero referrals to the Opportunity School or Multi-disciplinary Team in the first half of 2025/2026. Chronic Absenteeism Re-engagement Focused on students with 70% or more days of chronic absenteeism. Re-engagement efforts led to 65% transitioning to virtual/hybrid attendance and 88% of parents accepting case management and family wellness counseling. Suspension Rate No suspensions led to a student being referred to the Opportunity School Program in the 25/26 school year. ELPAC & Reclassification We do not have data regarding specific EL students tutored and their ELPAC and reclassification rates. Their information is factored into the total district rate, which is the Long-Term English Learner (LTEL) rate, dramatically contracted from 26% to 12%. Additionally, 39.6% of students demonstrated a full year of ELPAC progress. Attendance General attendance rose marginally (93.3% to 93.7%), but chronic absenteeism slightly increased (18.3% to 19%), notably among English Learners and African American students district-wide. Students in the Opportunity School Program chronic absenteeism decreases significantly by 50%. i-Ready (Reading) District-wide proficiency rose (54% to 57%), with strong English Learner growth, but a concerning dip for African American students (to 35%), which includes students supported by LCSSP. Statewide Assessments (CAASPP) Proficiency increased in ELA (49%) and Math (39.9%), but remains below 2027 benchmarks, with persistent achievement gaps for EL and LTEL students. This also includes students supported by LCSSP.
Financial ImpactThe financial impact of the LCSSP grant was $899,000, which was paid out during years 1 and 2 of the grant.
17.42:11:33Information on San Mateo County Investment Fund - February 2026Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractIn compliance with Education Code requirements, all district funds are deposited into the County Treasury, pooled with other public agencies in the County Investment Pool. The County Treasurer manages investment decisions, and earnings or losses are distributed proportionally to participants, a standard practice among San Mateo County school districts.
RationalePursuant to Education Code Sections 41001 and 41002, all funds received by or apportioned to a school district must be deposited into the county treasury and credited to the appropriate district fund. In accordance with Education Code Section 41015, a school district may invest all or a portion of the funds held in a Special Reserve Fund, as well as any surplus monies not immediately needed for operational purposes, in authorized investments outlined in Government Code Sections 16430 and 53601. Historically, school districts in San Mateo County, including this District, have deposited all funds with the County Treasury. The County Treasurer has managed investment decisions on behalf of the districts, a practice that is common throughout California. These district funds are pooled with those of other public agencies in the County Investment Pool, with earnings and losses distributed proportionally based on each participant’s investment share.
Financial ImpactGross pool earnings for Month ending February 28, 2026: 3.89% The current average maturity of the portfolio is 2.70 years, with an average duration of 2.44 years. The portfolio continues to hold no derivative products.
18Correspondence1min
192:11:35Other Business/Suggested Items for Future Agenda1min
202:11:40Board of Trustees Meeting Reflection10min
212:12:31Board of Trustees Meeting Calendar1min
222:27:00Adjournment (Action Required)