1Call to Order1min
1.1Roll CallProcedural
1.2Public Comment on Closed Session Items OnlyInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Board will limit comments to Closed Session items and will only be accepted in person.
RationaleSpeaker cards are available at the entrance and can be submitted to the secretary before the meeting begins. Alternatively, you may raise your hand prior to the start of the meeting to indicate your desire to speak.
Financial ImpactNone.
1.3Closed Session - 6:30 PM (20 min)Procedural
1.1CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(d)(2)Procedural
40:18Reconvene to Open Session at approximately 7:00 PM2min
4.1Roll CallProcedural
4.2Report Out on Closed Session from November 19, 2025Procedural
50:44Welcome1min
62:01Changes to the Agenda1min
72:23Approval of the Agenda (Action Required)1min
82:28Public Comment
92:43School/Community Reports40min
9.1Information on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools to Support Teaching and LearningInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe presentation is to inform the Board of Education about the district’s thoughtful exploration and ongoing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to enhance instructional practices, streamline teacher workload, and improve student outcomes. (20-minute presentation; 20-minute Board discussion)
RationaleThe purpose of the November 19, 2025, presentation is to inform the Board of Education about the district’s thoughtful exploration and ongoing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to enhance instructional practices, streamline teacher workload, and improve student outcomes. The presentation will inform the Board about the district’s AI research, exploration, and implementation timeline to provide background information for the Board members prior to their consideration of a formal policy. Teacher Usage and Integration Our teachers are already exploring and using AI tools to amplify their expertise and efficiency. These tools are employed for practical tasks such as Searching for and expanding on lesson plan ideas (e.g., expanding DOK levels on an activity). Generating ideas for feedback on student work and developing asset-based language. Creating rubrics, checklists, and leveled reading passages to support differentiated instruction. Drafting administrative documents (emails, IEP goals). The district’s current guidance for all staff emphasizes that AI must be a thought partner and assistant—not a replacement for human judgment. We stress the core principles of emphasizing humans in the loop and double-checking outputs for accuracy and bias. Professional Development and Safeguards Recognizing the rapid expansion of AI tools and the ethical responsibilities involved, the district has prepared an AI Handbook for Teachers and Administrators and is developing a comprehensive professional development plan. Our safeguards and next steps center on: Policy Adoption: Working with the Board to formally adopt a policy and create corresponding Administrative Regulations (ARs) that align with the district’s Mission, Vision, and Values (Equity, Safety, Rigor). Privacy and Ethics: Developing PD focused on the ethical and professional use of AI as a tool, with a high priority on protecting student privacy (a legal and ethical requirement) and considering equity and ethics in every application. Instructional Focus: Providing practical workshops for teachers to integrate AI to support MTSS and differentiated learning for all students, ensuring AI broadens access, rigor, and critical thinking. Tool Evaluation: Establishing clear criteria for evaluating and recommending new AI tools that meet the district's pedagogical goals and safety standards. The administration looks forward to engaging with the School Board on this critical topic and partnering to ensure a thoughtful and equitable implementation of AI across the district.
Financial ImpactNone at this time.
101:58:28Discussion Items - 1 hr 30 min
10.1Update on Local Funding Measure AnalysisDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractTeamCivX will provide an update of the evaluation for a potential local parcel tax measure, including the steps taken to date, key findings from voter research, outreach completed, and upcoming steps to be taken. The summary below outlines the process, polling results, community engagement efforts, and next steps that will guide the Board’s discussion and direction moving forward. (10-minute presentation; 30-minute Board discussion)
RationaleProcess Recap: How We Got Here: March 12 Board Meeting: Provided informational presentation re: parcel tax specifics, square footage rate scenarios, available election dates, and recommended next steps April 2 Board Meeting: Received direction to assess feasibility of a square footage parcel tax ballot measure Late May - Early June: Godbe Research conducted a poll of likely 2026 voters in the District about a potential parcel tax August 19 Board Meeting: Presented poll results and received direction to proceed to the awareness building phase to educate and inform the community about the district’s funding needs and a potential ballot measure Summary of Poll Results Ballot Question: To maintain excellent education for Redwood City Elementary School District students by preserving science, technology, and math instruction; attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers and counselors; supporting reading and writing programs; protecting quality arts and music programs; and maintaining manageable class sizes; shall Redwood City Elementary School District’s measure be adopted, levying 17.5¢ per building square foot, $25/ unimproved parcel, providing $14,300,000 annually, until ended by voters, with independent citizens’ oversight, senior citizen exemptions, no funds for administrators, with all funds staying local? Results: Initial vote: 63.5% Yes / 25.5% No / 11% Undecided or Don’t Know Interim vote (after positives): 73.2% Yes / 22.5% No / 4.3% Undecided or Don’t Know Informed vote (after negatives): 66.4% Yes / 26.5% No / 7.1% Undecided or Don’t Know Highest performing funding priorities: Attract and retain qualified teachers and counselors (78.2%) Maintain hands-on science classes (76.9%) Preserve science, technology, engineering and math instruction (76.7%) Provide math and science enrichment (76.6%) Support quality reading and writing programs (76.3%) Maintain manageable class sizes (74.4%) Overview of Materials & Ongoing Outreach Informational Fact Sheet, FAQ, and Powerpoint Webpage on district website: www.rcsdk8.net/our-district/local-funding Mail communications - Survey tear-off mailer Social media content posted along with mailer Stakeholder outreach/engagement to parents, teachers/staff, business owners, civic groups Next Steps: Additional Planned Communications & Timeline Mid Nov 2025: 1st Mailer - Survey tear off [DONE] Early/Mid Dec 2025: 2nd Mailer - Survey mailer results Early Jan 2026: Tracking poll conducted Mid Jan 2026: 3rd Mailer - Invitation to Feb Board meeting Feb 4, 2026: Present tracking poll results to Board and 1st reading of resolution Feb 11, 2026: Board votes to place resolution on June 2026 ballot Mid Feb 2026: 4th Mailer - Notice to voters of election Tracking Poll Process Nov 2025: Receive direction from Board about parcel tax measure structure Nov-Dec 2025: Draft tracking poll with District team, SCI, legal counsel, and TeamCivX Early Jan 2026: Tracking poll conducted Board Direction Regarding Measure Structure Tax rate - 17.5 cents per square foot Consideration of duration and potential sunset Consideration of cap on rate Revenue scenarios from SCI
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the school district at this time.
10.2First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4119.42: Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne PathogensDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4119.42: Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens. These were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy has been updated to align with regulations 29 CFR 1910.1030 and 8 CCR 5193. This policy pertains to certificated personnel. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.3First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4219.42: Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne PathogensDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4219.42: Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy is new for RCSD, which complies with 29 CFR 1910.1030 and 8 CCR 5193. This policy pertains to classified personnel. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.4First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4319.42: Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne PathogensDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4319.42: Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy is new to RCSD to comply with 29 CFR 1910.1030 and 8 CCR 5193. This policy pertains to personnel not otherwise categorized under Policies 4119.42 and 4219.42. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.5First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4119.43: Universal PrecautionsDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4119.43: Universal Precautions. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy has been updated to comply with regulations 8 CCR 5193(d) and 29 CFR 1910.1030. This policy applies to certificated personnel. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.6First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4219.43: Universal PrecautionsDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4219.43: Universal Precautions. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This new policy and regulation of RCSD complies with regulations 8 CCR 5193(d) and 29 CFR 1910.1030. It is to establish the expectation that all classified employees will observe universal precautions to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.7First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4319.43: Universal PrecautionsDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4319.43: Universal Precautions. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This new policy and regulation for RCSD complies with regulations 8 CCR 5193(d) and 29 CFR 1910.1030. It is to establish the expectation that all employees not otherwise categorized under Policies 4119.43 and 4219.43 will observe universal precautions to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.8First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4151: Employee CompensationDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4151: Employee Compensation. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy has been updated to reflect AB 938 (2024). This policy applies to certificated personnel. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.9First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4251: Employee CompensationDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4251: Employee Compensation. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This new policy to RCSD is in compliance with AB 938 (2024). This policy applies to classified personnel. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.10First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4351: Employee CompensationDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4351: Employee Compensation. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This new policy to RCSD is in compliance with AB 938 (2024). This policy applies to personnel not otherwise categorized under Policies 4151 and 4251. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.11First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4215: Evaluation/SupervisionDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4215: Evaluation/Supervision. This board policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This board policy is new to RCSD. Education Code 35171 mandates that the Governing Board adopt reasonable regulations related to evaluating the performance of classified personnel. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.12First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141: Health Care and EmergenciesDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141: Health Care and Emergencies. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy has been updated to clarify that automated external defibrillators (AED) are authorized to be used at designated school sites. There is also a requirement to acquire, place, and maintain trauma and emergency kits. There will also be training regarding the use of trauma kits. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.13First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.21: Administering Medication and Monitoring Health ConditionsDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.21: Administering Medication and Monitoring Health Conditions. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy has been updated to reflect AB 1283 (2023), which allows districts to provide emergency albuterol inhalers to nurses and trained personnel. It also follows AB 1722 (2023), which allows for the district to hire licensed vocational nurses following Governing Board approval. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.14First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 5141.5: Mental HealthDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 5141.5: Mental Health. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy reflects SB 153 (2024). There is also a discussion of material related to telehealth/other communication technologies for mental and behavioral health services for students. This policy has also been edited to apply to students up to 8th grade. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.15First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 6142.7: Physical Education and ActivityDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 6142.7: Physical Education and Activity. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This is a new policy for RCSD. It is to reflect Education Codes 51210 and 51220; the Board Policy Committee has revised the policy to only apply to students up to 8th grade. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
10.16First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 6142.8: Comprehensive Health EducationDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 6142.8: Comprehensive Health Education. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy on health education has been updated based on the new court decision of Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025). The policy allows an option to offer alternative activities of educational value if students are opted out of the curriculum; there will also be no disciplinary action or academic penalty if student has opted out. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
111:58:56Approval of Consent Items (Action Required)1min
11.1Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 0420.4: Charter School AuthorizationAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 0420.4: Charter School Authorization.
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025 board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.2Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy 0420.41: Charter School OversightAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy 0420.41: Charter School Oversight
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025 board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.3Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3100: BudgetAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3100: Budget
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.4Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3260: Fees and ChargesAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3260: Fees and Charges
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.5Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3311: BidsAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3311: Bids
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.6Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy 3311.1: Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting ProceduresAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy 3311.1: Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Procedures
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.7Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy 3312: ContractsAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy 3312: Contracts
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.8Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3550: Food Service/Child Nutrition ProgramAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3550: Food Service/Child Nutrition Program
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.9Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3551: Food Service Operations/Cafeteria FundAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3551: Food Service Operations/Cafeteria Fund
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.10Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3553: Free and Reduced Price MealsAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3553: Free and Reduced Price Meals
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.11Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4121: Temporary/ Substitute PersonnelAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4121: Temporary/ Substitute Personnel
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.12Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy 6144: Controversial IssuesAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy 6144: Controversial Issues
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.13Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 7214: General Obligation BondsAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 7214: General Obligation Bonds
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.14Second Reading and Approval of Board Bylaw 9250: Remuneration, Reimbursement, and Other Benefits and Adoption of Resolution No. 15Action (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Bylaw 9250: Remuneration, Reimbursement, and Other Benefits, and adopt Resolution No. 15.
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the November 12, 2025, board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
11.15Approval of Amendment No. 1 between the Redwood City School District and the Speech Pathology Group for increased fees for the Behavior Analyst due to Additional Hours Worked during the 2023-2024 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe District is amending the contract with the Speech Pathology Group to provide increased funding for Behavior Analyst hours that were encumbered during the 2023-2024 school year.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement between the Redwood City School District and Speech Pathology Group for additional services provided during the 2023-2024 school year.
RationaleDuring the 2023-2024 year a Behavior Analyst was hired through the Speech Pathology Group who supported students and families through the Learning Communities for School Success Program (LCSSP) as well as supported our teachers through a coaching model. The purpose of this amendment is to cover outstanding invoices for increased hours for the 2023/2024 school year. In November 2014, California voters approved Proposition 47 (Government Code Section 7599), the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act. The intent of Proposition 47 is to reduce the penalties for certain non-serious and non-violent property and drug offenses with the resulting state savings to be invested in prevention and support services. The proposition provides the following for use of the funds: Improve outcomes for public school pupils in K–12, by reducing truancy and supporting students who are at risk of dropping out of school or are victims of crime; and to expand programs for public school pupils in K–12. Subsequent legislation (Assembly Bill 1014 and Senate Bill 527), provided the statutory language to implement the Proposition 47 grant program and established the Learning Communities for School Success Program (LCSSP) setting forth the following: Funding provided to K–12 education should be used to help build the capacity of local educational agencies (LEAs) or a consortium of LEAs to identify and implement evidence-based, non-punitive programs and practices to keep our most vulnerable pupils in school, consistent with each LEA’s Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), including, but not limited to, goals for pupil engagement and school climate. Funding available to provide resources to LEAs/consortiums for establishing community schools and address pupil attendance problems in K–12. LEAs participating in the LCSSP grant program, whether applying as a single LEA or a member of a consortium, are to report and evaluate outcomes using multiple measures, while engaging in a broader community of practice that disseminates promising and proven strategies to LEAs statewide. The goals of the LCSSP are to support evidence-based, non-punitive programs and practices aimed at keeping the state’s most vulnerable pupils in school. These programs and practices must complement and enhance the actions and services identified to meet the LEA’s goals as provided in their LCAP, regardless if the LEA is applying alone or part of a consortium. In May 2022, the RCSD applied for the LCSSP Grant Cohort 6 with the plan to strengthen the Opportunity School Program in our District. The RCSD Opportunity Program offers students attending the program the opportunity to be in the program for a week or two and then return to their home school or to start at a new school site. This is a collaborative decision among the school administration, teachers, parents, and students. Students attending the program have a teacher who supports them in academics in a small class setting. Students are expected to complete the class work so they can improve their grades. There is also an opportunity for the student to reflect on their behavior and to learn about making decisions to support their learning experiences at school. One of the greatest needs for this program is to provide students with support for their emotional and behavioral needs.
Financial ImpactThe previous contract was approved on August 17, 2023, for a total amount of $172,672. The fiscal impact of the first amendment is $56,800, which will bring the amended contract to $229,472 upon School Board approval. The funding source will be the LCSSP grant.
11.16Ratification of Warrant Registers, October 1, 2025 - October 31, 2025Action (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe attached report provides a listing of district expenditures totaling $6,737,957.21 for the period from October 1–31, 2025, in accordance with Education Code Section 42631.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board of Education ratify the attached warrant registers as submitted.
RationalePursuant to Education Code Section 42631, all disbursements of district funds must be approved by written order of the Governing Board. The attached warrant registers reflect expenditures from various funds totaling $6,737,957.21 for the period from October 1–31, 2025.
Financial ImpactThe total disbursement from the San Mateo County Treasurer’s Office was $6,737,957.21, representing actual expenditures across all district funds.
12Action Items (Action Required)20min
12.1Approval of the Retirement Notification IncentiveAction
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractIn an effort to streamline staffing planning for the 2026-2027 school year and to assist in managing staffing reductions, it is the Administration’s recommendation to offer an early retirement notification incentive.
RecommendationThe incentive will be available as outlined below for those employees who notify Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent, in writing via the RCSD Retirement/Notice of Separation form, by the deadlines below. $2,000 (Two thousand dollars) to employees with 1-34 years of service completed as of June 2025; $5,000 for employees with 35+ years of service completed as of June 2025 All Certificated Employees: Notification deadline by 01/15/2025 | Retirement deadline by 06/30/2025 All Classified Employees: Notification deadline by 01/15/2025 | Retirement deadline by 08/15/2025
RationaleFor reference purposes, the following chart denotes the previous years’ retirement notifications from employees: Notification Date Management Employees CSEA Employees RCTA Employees Received by 2/15/25 for the 2025-26 school year 1 9 8 Received by 2/15/24 for the 2024-25 school year 1 6 4 Received by 2/15/23 for the 2023-24 school year 2 3 6 Received by 2/15/22 for the 2021-22 school year 5 10 6 Received by 2/15/21 for the 2020-21 school year 1 9 8
Financial ImpactUp to $50,000 in the Unrestricted General Fund ending balance, depending on the number of notifications received by the deadline.
131:59:32Board and Superintendent Reports10min
142:14:29Information1min
14.1Information on San Mateo County Investment Fund - October 2025Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractIn compliance with Education Code requirements, all district funds are deposited into the County Treasury, pooled with other public agencies in the County Investment Pool. The County Treasurer manages investment decisions, and earnings or losses are distributed proportionally to participants, a standard practice among San Mateo County school districts.
RationalePursuant to Education Code Sections 41001 and 41002, all funds received by or apportioned to a school district must be deposited into the county treasury and credited to the appropriate district fund. In accordance with Education Code Section 41015, a school district may invest all or a portion of the funds held in a Special Reserve Fund, as well as any surplus monies not immediately needed for operational purposes, in authorized investments outlined in Government Code Sections 16430 and 53601. Historically, school districts in San Mateo County, including this District, have deposited all funds with the County Treasury. The County Treasurer has managed investment decisions on behalf of the districts, a practice that is common throughout California. These district funds are pooled with those of other public agencies in the County Investment Pool, with earnings and losses distributed proportionally based on each participant’s investment share.
Financial ImpactGross pool earnings for Month ending October 31, 2025: 4.156% The current average maturity of the portfolio is 2.56 years, with an average duration of 2.30 years. The portfolio continues to hold no derivative products.
152:14:39Correspondence1min
162:15:51Other Business/Suggested Items for Future Agenda1min
172:16:37Board of Trustees Meeting Reflection10min
182:19:01Board of Trustees Meeting Calendar1min
192:20:48Adjournment (Action Required)