10:07Call to Order1min
1.1Roll CallProcedural
20:19Welcome1min
30:19Changes to the Agenda1min
41:43Approval of the Agenda (Action Required)1min
51:54Public Comment
640:08School/Community Reports 1 hr 30 min
6.1Integrated ELD Instructional Coaching ReportInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractReport: Integrated English Language Development Instructional Coaching
RationaleThe integrated ELD coaching model is designed to build the collective capacity of administrators, instructional coaches, and classroom teachers to ensure that English Learners (ELs) or Multilingual Learners (MLLs) experience equitable access to high-quality instruction across all areas.
Financial ImpactThe funding source is a total of $302,500. Arts Music Instructional Material (AMIM) Grant funds= $272,500. Federal Title III English Learner funds = $30,000
6.2Report on iReady Assessment ResultsInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Board will receive an overview of the 2024-2025 district-wide iReady assessment results in reading and mathematics, as well as the Fall 2025 baseline data. In addition to CAASPP English Language Arts data for third-grade students with continuous enrollment since kindergarten.
RationaleThe Board of Education will receive information regarding the 2024-2025 district-wide iReady assessment results in reading and mathematics. The presentation includes a comparison of the Fall 2024 and Spring 2025 results, as well as longitudinal data trends from Fall 2023 through Fall 2025. I-Ready is an integrated mathematics and reading program composed of two primary components: iReady Assessment: An adaptive K-12 diagnostic tool that measures student growth and standards of mastery. iReady Instruction: A personalized K-8 learning program that supports differentiated instruction based on student needs. Teachers in the Redwood City School District have implemented iReady since the Fall of 2020. During the 2024-25 school year, the assessment was administered twice, once in the fall and again in spring, to measure each student's progress toward grade-level standards in reading and mathematics. The attached presentation provides: A comparison of student performance between the Fall 2024 and Spring 2025 assessments. A longitudinal comparison of Fall 2023 through Fall 2025 data to establish a performance baseline for the current year. A longitudinal analysis of CAASPP English Language Arts results for third-grade students with continuous enrollment since kindergarten, disaggregated by student subgroups.
Financial ImpactNone at this time.
7Discussion Items45min
7.1First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3515.2: DisruptionsDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3515.2: Disruptions. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. CSBA has updated the board policy and administrative regulation to outline RCSD’s authority to restrict non-student access to school campuses in order to prevent disruptions. Based on the California Court of Appeal, officials are not required to wait for an actual disruption before taking action. The policy reflects Education Code 48902, which requires administration to notify law enforcement when students bring firearms or explosives to campus. Additionally, the regulation clarifies that school administrators have the authority to remove individuals from school grounds under Penal Code 626.7,626.8, and 636.85. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
7.2First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4020: Drug and Alcohol Free WorkplaceDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4020: Drug and Alcohol Free Workplace. This board policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The changes made to Board Policy 4020 affirm that RCSD must maintain a drug-free workplace in compliance with the Drug-Free Workplace Act. The policy requires certification from contracting agencies, such as the California Department of Education, that RCSD will take specified steps to prevent drug use in the workplace. If an employee is convicted of a controlled substance offense, the district must take disciplinary action or require rehabilitation within 30 days of notification. The district also has discretion to place employees on compulsory leave when charged with other drug offenses and is required to dismiss those who are convicted. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
7.3First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4112.42 Drug and Alcohol Testing For School Bus DriversDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4112.42 Drug and Alcohol Testing For School Bus Drivers. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. CSBA clarifies the obligation of bus and van drivers to comply with federal drug and alcohol testing requirements, including consequences based on test results. The policy updates specify that RCSD is responsible for approving temporary removal of drivers from safety-sensitive duties prior to verification of test results and outlines consequences tied to specific alcohol concentration levels. Additionally, the policy reinforces that drivers offered reinstatement after a violation must first undergo evaluation by a qualified substance abuse professional and comply with recommended treatment. The accompanying regulation is new to RCSD, which reiterates that marijuana remains an illegal substance under federal law and its use by drivers is prohibited. It also revises the definition of "alcohol concentration" and expands the responsibilities of the designated employer representative, particularly around pre-employment and post-accident testing. Federal mandates require RCSD to report violations to the Commercial Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse and to conduct mandatory queries before and during employment. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.4First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4121: Temporary/Substitute PersonnelDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4121: Temporary/Substitute Personnel. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. Although RCSD has had this regulation in place, the board policy is new to the district. The policy reflects California laws AB 897 and SB 616 set in 2023. AB 897 requires employment agreements for categorically funded positions to specify the project’s end date, funding source, and program nature. SB 616 updates sick leave provisions, mandating a minimum accrual of 40 hours or five days by the 200th calendar day, or granting the same amount at the start of each year. It also extends anti-retaliation protections to employees under collective bargaining agreements. Additionally, board policy clarifies that up to 80 hours or ten days of sick leave may carry over annually, but use may be limited to 40 hours or five days per year. Regulation updates clarify the definition of "time of initial employment." The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.5First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4158: Employee SecurityDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4158: Employee Security. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The updated RCSD policy reflects recent CSBA revisions and incorporates several key changes. It authorizes collective bargaining representatives to seek temporary restraining orders on behalf of employees facing workplace harassment, violence, or credible threats, provided they represent the employee in labor matters. The policy also incorporates Executive Order 14127, which establishes a task force to guide schools on active shooter drills and firearm threats. Regulations now require Comprehensive Safety Plans to include procedures for assessing and responding to dangerous or unlawful activity on campus, at school-sponsored events, or on school buses. Reports of attacks, assaults, or physical threats must be forwarded immediately to the Superintendent or designee. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.6First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4200: Classified PersonnelDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4200: Classified Personnel. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This is an updated policy for RCSD. The policy reflects the requirements of Education Code 45103 and 45104. The regulation was revised by CSBA, and RCSD staff chose CSBA’s Option 2, noted in the marked copy, as RCSD is not a Merit System District. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.7First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4257: Employee SafetyDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4257: Employee Safety. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy and regulation are new to RCSD and applies to Classified Personnel. CSBA references SB 553 (2023), which requires, starting July 1, 2024, districts to establish, implement, and maintain at all times and in all work areas a workplace violence prevention plan with specified components. The District has fulfilled this requirement as of July 1, 2024, and continues to update the plan each year. Mandatory staff training is also in place and is completed annually. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.8First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4258: Employee SecurityDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4258: Employee Security. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy is new to RCSD and applies to Classified Personnel. The recent CSBA revisions incorporate several key changes. It authorizes collective bargaining representatives to seek temporary restraining orders on behalf of employees facing workplace harassment, violence, or credible threats, provided they represent the employee in labor matters. The policy also incorporates Executive Order 14127, which establishes a task force to guide schools on active shooter drills and firearm threats. Regulations now require Comprehensive Safety Plans to include procedures for assessing and responding to dangerous or unlawful activity on campus, at school-sponsored events, or on school buses. Reports of attacks, assaults, or physical threats must be forwarded immediately to the Superintendent or designee. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.9First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4259: Employee Assistance ProgramsDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4259: Employee Assistance Programs. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This is a new policy for RCSD that applies to RCSD’s Classified Personnel. CSBA notes that under Government Code 8355 and 41 USC 8101-8106, the district must inform its employees about any drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs available to them. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.10First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4313.4: Temporary Modified/Light Duty AssignmentDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4313.4: Temporary Modified/Light Duty Assignment. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. CSBA has noted that some employers have developed return-to-work plans that use temporary modified/light-duty assignments as a strategy to help reduce workers' compensation costs and to maximize employee productivity and morale. The new policy to RCSD defines "temporary modified/light duty assignment" as a temporary assignment, as an alternative to the employee's regular duties, to which the employee will be assigned until the employee can return to full duty or is classified as permanently disabled. When an employee is temporarily disabled, he/she may also qualify for leave pursuant to state and federal law, such as industrial accident or illness leave (Education Code 44984 and 45192) or family care and medical leave (29 USC 2601-2654 and Government Code 12945.1-12945.2). The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.11First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4315: Evaluation/SupervisionDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4315: Evaluation/Supervision. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This board policy is new to RCSD. Education Code 35171 mandates that the Governing Board adopt reasonable regulations related to evaluating the performance of certificated personnel, including certificated administrative and supervisory personnel. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.12First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4357: Employee SafetyDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4357: Employee Safety. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy and regulation are new to RCSD and apply to personnel not already specified in Policy 4157 and Policy 4257. CSBA references SB 553 (2023), which requires, starting July 1, 2024, districts to establish, implement, and maintain at all times and in all work areas a workplace violence prevention plan with specified components. The District implemented this program as of July 1, 2024, and has continued to update and implement the program. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.13First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4358: Employee SecurityDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4358: Employee Security. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy is new to RCSD and applies to personnel not otherwise covered under Policy 4158 and 4258. The recent CSBA revisions incorporate several key changes. It authorizes collective bargaining representatives to seek temporary restraining orders on behalf of employees facing workplace harassment, violence, or credible threats, provided they represent the employee in labor matters. The policy also incorporates Executive Order 14127, which establishes a task force to guide schools on active shooter drills and firearm threats. Regulations now require Comprehensive Safety Plans to include procedures for assessing and responding to dangerous or unlawful activity on campus, at school-sponsored events, or on school buses. Reports of attacks, assaults, or physical threats must be forwarded immediately to the Superintendent or designee. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.14First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4359: Employee Assistance ProgramsDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4359: Employee Assistance Programs. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This is a new policy for RCSD that applies to RCSD’s personnel not otherwise specified in Policy 4159 and Policy 4259. CSBA notes that under Government Code 8355 and 41 USC 8101-8106, the district must inform its employees about any drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs available to them. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.15First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5131.6: Alcohol and Other DrugsDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5131.6: Alcohol and Other Drugs. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. CSBA's updates reflect several new laws aimed at addressing student safety and substance abuse education. RCSD would be required to annually inform parents/guardians about the dangers of synthetic drugs, including fentanyl, and the role of social media in their distribution, according to AB 2690 (2024). The policy also incorporates AB 2711 (2024), which protects students from suspension when voluntarily seeking help for substance use, and SB 997 (2024) and AB 2998 (2024), which permit students to carry fentanyl test strips and opioid overdose reversal medications like naloxone while on school grounds or at school activities. Additionally, districts may now consider alternatives to law enforcement referrals in response to student opioid misuse, where legally permissible. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.16First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 6142.93: Science InstructionDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 6142.93: Science Instruction. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy has been updated to expand the philosophical statement to specify the Governing Board's belief that science instruction includes the place of humans in ecological systems, the causes and effects of climate change, and the methods to mitigate and adapt to climate change, and experiments and other activities that foster critical thinking. Additionally, this policy update clarifies that the Governing Board is required to adopt academic standards for science which meet or exceed the California Next Generation Science Standards and describe the knowledge and skills students are expected to possess at each grade level, with an instructional focus on understanding the process of science, the fundamental ideas within each discipline of science, and underlying themes that are common to all sciences. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
7.17First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 6142.94: History-Social Science InstructionDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 6142.94: History-Social Science Instruction. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. This policy has been updated to expand the philosophical statement to specify the Governing Board's belief that history-social science instruction includes a foundation for the appreciation of different ethnicities, the wise use of natural resources, and the responsible management of personal finance. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
7.18First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 6161.11: Supplementary Instructional MaterialsDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 6161.11: Supplementary Instructional Materials. This policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. CSBA has updated the policy to align with AB 1078 (2023), which clarifies when it is unlawful discrimination for the Board to prohibit or refuse to approve instructional materials or library resources. It also reflects new state requirements for the California Department of Education to issue guidance on reviewing materials for cultural relevance and public access to information about inclusive curriculum rights. The policy now allows related discrimination complaints to be filed under the district’s uniform complaint procedures. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
7.19First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 6163.2: Animals at SchoolDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRevisions resulted from changes from the California School Boards Association (CSBA) and suggestions from Redwood City School District (RCSD) staff.
RationaleIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 6163.2: Animals at School. This policy and regulation were reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. RCSD is mandated to modify policies to permit an individual with a disability to use a service animal at school when the work or task performed by the service animal is directly related to the individual's disability. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted text indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Board Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
8Approval of Consent Items (Action Required)1min
8.1Approval of the North Star 5th-Grade Field Trip to Pier 40, San Francisco on March 10, March 17, and March 24Action (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe North Star 5th-grade field trip to Pier 40, San Francisco, offers students the opportunity to learn about the lives of 19th-century sailors who sailed on the SF Bay.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the proposed field trip to Pier 40 with a sail in the SF Bay for North Star's 5th grade.
RationaleThis field trip provides a valuable educational experience that aligns with the Social Studies Curriculum and supports student development in a historical context. Students will have an opportunity to participate in the duties of a 19th-century sailor (raising and lowering sails, steering the ship, swabbing the deck, lowering and raising anchor, etc.)
Financial ImpactThis field trip will be funded through parent donations and PTO scholarships.
8.2Approval of the Addendum to the Measure U Application for Garfield Community School for the 2025-2026 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThese funds support schools in strengthening academics, attracting and retaining qualified teachers, enhancing arts and music programs, and updating instructional technology.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and approve Garfield’s Addendum to their 2025-2026 Measure U Application.
RationaleFor Measure U, Garfield was given an allotment for 2025-2026 of $79,463 and a carryover from 2024-25 of $60,000 for a total of $139,463. Garfield's School Site Council met on September 23, 2025, and approved their Measure U Addendum. The following are amendments proposed for Measure U for Garfield Community School for the 2025-2026 school year: Allocate $40,000 to fund the Art Teacher position. Allot $20,000 to purchase class sets of leveled readers for our classes that are teaching reading in English (Spanish books were ordered last year) to increase decoding and comprehension of our emerging English Learners/Readers. The book sets align with the current assessment, and as such can be used during small group reading instruction, and sent home with the student for additional practice. All of the members in attendance at the School Site Council meeting on September 23, 2025, voted to approve the recommendations at the meeting. The updated application for Measure U funds is attached for review.
Financial ImpactPlease see the attached Addendum for details.
8.3Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy 0520: Intervention in Underperforming SchoolsAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy 0520: Intervention in Underperforming Schools.
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the September 18, 2025 board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
8.4Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5131: ConductAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5131: Conduct
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the September 18, 2025 board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
8.5Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.52 Suicide PreventionAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.52 Suicide Prevention.
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the September 18, 2025 board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
8.6Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy 6154: Homework/Makeup WorkAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy 6154: Homework/Makeup Work.
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the September 18, 2025 board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
8.7Second Reading and Approval of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 6174: Education for English LearnersAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board read and approve Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 6174: Education for English Learners.
RationaleThis policy was discussed at the September 18, 2025 board meeting as a First Reading.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
8.8Approval of the Agreement between Redwood City School District and AchieveKids to provide Non-Public School (NPS) Services for the 2025-2026 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe agreement aims to guarantee that students can access specialist services from non-public schools when suitable programs are unavailable in their home district.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the agreement between Redwood City School District and AchieveKids to provide Non-Public School (NPS) services for the 2025-2026 school year.
RationaleThe purpose of the agreement is to ensure that, when necessary, students have access to specialized services operated by a Non-Public School (NPS) when an appropriate program is not available in the pupils' district of residence. It is agreed that when a student is placed in a special education program in their school of attendance, through the individualized educational plan process, then the district of residence retains all financial and legal responsibilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and related federal and California laws. The agreement with AchieveKids will encompass 1 contract covering the term from 10/06/2025 to 6/30/2026. The agreement is coming late to the board due to incomplete paperwork.
Financial ImpactThe financial impact of the contract is a total of $84,389.04, which will be funded out of the SPED fund.
8.9Approval of the Agreement between Redwood City School District and After School Music Academy for the 2025-2026 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThis agreement is made between the Redwood City School District and After School Music Academy to provide enrichment classes for expanded day learning programs.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the agreement between the Redwood City School District and After School Music Academy for the 2025-2026 school year.
RationaleEnrichment classes will offer a diverse range of dance and martial arts sessions, totaling 768 hours over a 24-week period. Classes will be held at four REACH sites, three PAL sites, three BGCP sites, and Casa Circulo Cultural. Services will be carried out from November 13, 2025, through June 30, 2026, aligning with the Community Schools Department grant and payment cycle.
Financial ImpactThe contract amount is not to exceed $201,600.00. The funding will come directly from the Expanded Learning Opportunity Program Grant with no financial impact on RCSD general or concentrated funds. The school district is the fiscal agent for the grant.
8.10Approval of Personnel ReportAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe attached Personnel Report summarizes personnel actions taken between 09/10/2025–10/10/2025.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the attached Personnel Report.
RationaleThe attached Personnel Report includes personnel recommended for hire, personnel requesting a leave of absence, and personnel leaving employment.
Financial ImpactAll positions are approved in the 2025-2026 budget.
8.11Ratification of Warrant Registers, September 1, 2025 - September 30, 2025Action (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe attached report provides a listing of district expenditures totaling $13,374,439.28 for the period from September 1–30, 2025, in accordance with Education Code Section 42631.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board of Education ratify the attached warrant registers as submitted.
RationalePursuant to Education Code Section 42631, all disbursements of district funds must be approved by written order of the Governing Board. The attached warrant registers reflect expenditures from various funds totaling $13,374,439.28 for the period from September 1–30, 2025.
Financial ImpactThe total disbursement from the San Mateo County Treasurer’s Office was $13,374,439.28, representing actual expenditures across all district funds.
9Action Items (Action Required)15min
9.1Approval of Release of Temporary Teacher. Ed Code 44954Action
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractEnd of Contracted Temporary teacher assignment.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board release the temporary certificated employee listed below effective September 22, 2025. (Must be approved as an Action Item) EE# 1365 FTE 1.0
RationalePer Ed Code 44954, "Governing boards of school districts may release temporary employees requiring certification qualifications under the following circumstances: (a) At the pleasure of the board prior to serving during one school year at least 75 percent of the number of days the regular schools of the district are maintained".
Financial ImpactNone.
9.2Approval of Provisional Internship PermitAction
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Provisional Internship Permit (PIP), established by the CTC in 2005, enables schools to hire individuals who have not yet met subject matter competency requirements when no fully credentialed candidates are available.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve a Provisional Internship Permit for the following positions for the 2025-26 school year. (Must be approved as an Action Item. )
RationaleAccording to the CTC, the Provisional Internship Permit (PIP) was created in response to the phasing out of emergency permits and became effective on July 1, 2005. It allows an employing agency to fill an immediate staffing need by hiring an individual who has not yet met the subject matter competence requirement needed to enter an intern program. Prior to requesting a PIP, the employing agency must verify that a diligent search has been made, and a fully-credentialed teacher cannot be found. The PIP is available in the areas of Multiple Subject, Single Subject, and Education Specialist. Individuals who were issued four or fewer Long-Term Emergency Permits may be issued the PIP as long as the employer requirements have been met. Individuals who were issued five Long-Term Emergency Permits do not qualify for the PIP. The PIP will be issued for one year. Sixth Grade Multiple Subject Teacher - Kennedy Middle School We are requesting a Provisional Internship Permit for Kristin McGee-Morley, a sixth grade Art and Humanities teacher for Kennedy Middle School. Ms. McGee-Morley has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Studio Art and is planning on applying to programs to obtain her California teaching credential (Multiple Subject).
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the District at this time.
9.3Adoption of Resolution No. 14, Authorizing Continued Funding Application for District California State Preschool ProgramsAction
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractApproval of Resolution No. 14 authorizes the District to continue applying for funding for its California State Preschool Programs.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the attached resolution authorizing the Continued Funding Application for the District California State Preschool Program (CSPP) for fiscal year 2026-27.
RationaleRedwood City Elementary School District offers state preschool programs at the following locations: Adelante-Selby, Garfield, Hawes, Hoover, Orion, Roosevent and Taft. The programs provide developmentally appropriate school readiness activities for young children ages 2 to Kindergarten entry. School readiness is assessed using the California Desired Results Developmental Profile (DRDP) assessment instrument. There are currently 6 AM/PM part day and 9 full day preschool programs for a total of 21 preschool programs available at no cost or low cost for families who qualify by income and need. Families of moderate means may be accepted into the District State Preschool on a full fee basis is space allows after all eligible families have been enrolled. The District State Preschools have a total maximum capacity of 416 and are generally open to serve families Monday to Friday, from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. The Child Development Fund (aka Fund 12) is used to account separately for Federal, State and local revenues to operate the school district's California State Preschool Program (CSPP) for students (Education Code Section 8328). The Child Development Fund may only be used for necessary expenditures related to the operation of the district preschool programs.
Financial ImpactNot to exceed $9,120,302 in California Department of Education CSPP Grant.
9.4Approval of the Reclassification of Classified EmployeesAction
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractApproval of reclassification of Lead Custodian I & Lead Custodian II.
RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board of Education approve the reclassification of the classified positions specified below. (Must be approved as an action item) Lead Custodian I Lead Custodian II
RationaleArticle 14.1.3 of the California School Employees Association (CSEA) Master Contract, Reclassification, includes criteria for an adjustment in salary based on wage comparability of similar, regional elementary school districts within San Mateo County. The Reclassification Committee met on October 25, 2024, December 12, 2024, and March 10, 2025, to review requests for reclassification and a final report of the committee was submitted to the Superintendent for consideration. The Superintendent has reviewed the reclassification request and salary schedules from similar, regional elementary school districts within San Mateo County. After comparing wages of similar, regional elementary school districts within San Mateo County, we are asking the Board to approve the following final recommendations for reclassification retroactive to November 1, 2024. Lead Custodian I: Grade 21.5 to 22.0 Lead Custodian II: Grade 22.5 to 23.0
Financial ImpactThe total financial impact of this item, starting November 1, 2024, through the end of the 25–26 fiscal year, is $50,162 to be funded by the General Fund (Fund 01). Annual impact is approximately $30,091.
10Board and Superintendent Reports10min
11Information
11.1Quarterly Williams Report, 1st Quarter, July 2025 through September 2025Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractPursuant to Education Code §35186 and Assembly Bill 831 (Williams Legislation), all school districts are mandated to adopt and implement Uniform Complaint Procedures (UCP) to address specific concerns related to the sufficiency of instructional materials, the condition of school facilities, and the appropriate assignment of teachers. These procedures ensure that students have equal access to adequate learning resources, safe learning environments, and properly assigned and credentialed teachers.
SummaryThis agenda item serves to inform the Board and the public of the District’s compliance with the Williams legislation. The legislation was enacted to promote equity in education by requiring that all students have access to essential academic materials, safe facilities, and qualified teachers. The District remains committed to addressing any related complaints in a timely and consistent manner using the established UCP framework. On a quarterly basis, the Superintendent or designee shall report to the Board at a regularly scheduled Board meeting and to the County Superintendent of Schools, summarized data on the nature and resolution of all complaints. The report shall include the number of complaints by general subject area, with the number of resolved and unresolved complaints. As per AB 831, on October 12, 2005, the Redwood City School Board approved the revisions to Board Policy 1312.5, Williams Uniform Complaint Procedures Notice to Parents/Guardians: Complaint Rights. Submission of Quarterly Reports on Williams Uniform Complaints was required beginning in April 2005. On June 11, 2025, the School Board read and approved board policy and administrative regulation 1312.3 Uniform Complaint Procedures and approved administrative regulations and exhibit 1312.4 Williams Uniform Complaint Procedures. The Redwood City School District has not received any complaints and remains in compliance by submitting the required reports on a quarterly basis.
Financial ImpactNone when the School District remains in compliance.
11.2Redwood City School District Review of Connect Community Charter School's Unaudited Actuals for Fiscal Year 2024-25Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRCSD completed its review and issued findings on Connect Community Charter School’s Unaudited Actuals for 2024–25.
RationaleAs the authorizing agency for Connect Community Charter School, the Redwood City School District (RCSD) maintains fiscal oversight responsibilities, which include monitoring the charter school’s financial operations to ensure long-term fiscal solvency and stability. The attached letter from RCSD provides a summary of the District’s review and findings regarding Connect Community Charter School’s Unaudited Actuals for the 2024–25 fiscal year.
Financial ImpactNone.
11.3Redwood City School District Review of KIPP Excelencia's Unaudited Actuals for Fiscal Year 2024-25Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRCSD completed its review and issued findings on KIPP Excelencia’s Unaudited Actuals for 2024–25.
RationaleAs the authorizing agency for KIPP Excelencia, the Redwood City School District (RCSD) maintains fiscal oversight responsibilities, which include monitoring the charter school’s financial operations to ensure long-term fiscal solvency and stability. The attached letter from RCSD provides a summary of the District’s review and findings regarding KIPP Excelencia’s Unaudited Actuals for the 2024–25 fiscal year.
Financial ImpactNone.
11.4Redwood City School District Review of Rocketship Redwood City's Unaudited Actuals for Fiscal Year 2024-25Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRCSD completed its review and issued findings on Rocketship Redwood City’s Unaudited Actuals for 2024–25.
RationaleAs the authorizing agency for Rocketship Redwood City, the Redwood City School District (RCSD) maintains fiscal oversight responsibilities, which include monitoring the charter school’s financial operations to ensure long-term fiscal solvency and stability. The attached letter from RCSD provides a summary of the District’s review and findings regarding Rocketship Redwood City’s Unaudited Actuals for the 2024–25 fiscal year.
Financial ImpactNone.
11.5Information on San Mateo County Investment Fund - August 2025Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractIn compliance with Education Code requirements, all district funds are deposited into the County Treasury, pooled with other public agencies in the County Investment Pool. The County Treasurer manages investment decisions, and earnings or losses are distributed proportionally to participants, a standard practice among San Mateo County school districts.
RationalePursuant to Education Code Sections 41001 and 41002, all funds received by or apportioned to a school district must be deposited into the county treasury and credited to the appropriate district fund. In accordance with Education Code Section 41015, a school district may invest all or a portion of the funds held in a Special Reserve Fund, as well as any surplus monies not immediately needed for operational purposes, in authorized investments outlined in Government Code Sections 16430 and 53601. Historically, school districts in San Mateo County, including this District, have deposited all funds with the County Treasury. The County Treasurer has managed investment decisions on behalf of the districts, a practice that is common throughout California. These district funds are pooled with those of other public agencies in the County Investment Pool, with earnings and losses distributed proportionally based on each participant’s investment share.
Financial ImpactGross pool earnings for Month ending August 31, 2025: 3.933% The current average maturity of the portfolio is 2.5 years, with an average duration of 2.24 years. The portfolio continues to hold no derivative products.
11.6Information on San Mateo County Investment Fund - September 2025Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractIn compliance with Education Code requirements, all district funds are deposited into the County Treasury, pooled with other public agencies in the County Investment Pool. The County Treasurer manages investment decisions, and earnings or losses are distributed proportionally to participants, a standard practice among San Mateo County school districts.
RationalePursuant to Education Code Sections 41001 and 41002, all funds received by or apportioned to a school district must be deposited into the county treasury and credited to the appropriate district fund. In accordance with Education Code Section 41015, a school district may invest all or a portion of the funds held in a Special Reserve Fund, as well as any surplus monies not immediately needed for operational purposes, in authorized investments outlined in Government Code Sections 16430 and 53601. Historically, school districts in San Mateo County, including this District, have deposited all funds with the County Treasury. The County Treasurer has managed investment decisions on behalf of the districts, a practice that is common throughout California. These district funds are pooled with those of other public agencies in the County Investment Pool, with earnings and losses distributed proportionally based on each participant’s investment share.
Financial ImpactGross pool earnings for Month ending September 30, 2025: 3.887% Quarter ending September 30, 2025: 3.949% The current average maturity of the portfolio is 2.62 years, with an average duration of 2.36 years. The portfolio continues to hold no derivative products.
12Correspondence1min
13Other Business/Suggested Items for Future Agenda
14Board of Trustees Meeting Reflection10min
15Board of Trustees Meeting Calendar1min
16Adjournment (Action Required)