10:06Call to Order1min
1.10:06Roll CallProcedural
2Oral Communication on Closed Session Items Only
2.1If you have public comment related to a Closed Session item, please post it on the links under Public Content prior to the Closed Session Meeting or immediately upon the meeting opening.Information
Item details
Public Comment Links: English: https://forms.gle/pNa5GYrn7FxEQUm16 Spanish: https://forms.gle/Be1RWE6Rwyh6Mrs1A §
3Closed Session – 5:30 - 6:45 p.m.
3.1CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code, 54956.8) Property: 750 Bradford St, Redwood City, CA 94063 Agency negotiators: John Baker, Superintendent, Peter Ingram, Consultant, and Clarissa Canady, Legal Counsel, Negotiating parties: Redwood City School District and The Sobrato Organization Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment of Property Exchange AgreementDiscussion
Item details
Rationale: Conference with Real Property Negotiators. Property: 750 Bradford Street, Redwood City, CA 94063 Agency Negotiator: John R. Baker, Superintendent; Peter Ingram, Property Consultant; and Clarissa Canady, Attorney for District. Negotiating Parties: The Sobrato Organization and Redwood City School District. Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment of Property Exchange Agreement Submission for Approval Prepared by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
40:06Reconvene to Regular Session at Approximately 7:00 p.m.2min
4.10:44Roll CallProcedural
4.20:59Report Out on Closed Session from May 28, 2025Information
Item details
§
50:59Welcome1min
5.1Welcome by the School Board President, Mike WellsProcedural
62:20Changes to the Agenda1min
6.1Additions, Deletions, or Modifications to the AgendaDiscussion
72:33Approval of Agenda1min
7.1Approval of AgendaAction
82:56Oral Communication
Maria Stockton (2min) — CSEA President announced a new CSEA scholarship for graduating eighth graders, highlighted Classified Employee Appreciation Week activities, and invited board members to a Welcome Back Classified Appreciation Family Picnic on August 23rd.
Husham Sharifi (2min) — A prospective RCSD parent described how his daughter was dropped from the Orion Mandarin Immersion TK enrollment register without any written or email notification, leaving his family without a school placement for the upcoming year.
Susanne Ruiz-Dunlap (2min) — A kindergarten teacher at Adelante Selby expressed concern that the district had no plan for early release days or staggered start for kindergarten despite class sizes of up to 28, and urged the board to reconsider the kindergarten start schedule and include teachers in related conversations.
8.1If you have public comment related to a Regular Board Meeting item, please post it on the links available under Public Content prior to the Regular Board Meeting or immediately upon the meeting opening.Information
Item details
Public Comment Links: English: https://forms.gle/k5QArtnnkTjsGxmA8 Spanish: https://forms.gle/RnTQMxLxJeSTcKAn7 §
910:51Bond Program Discussion Items45min
Carlos Velasco Arreola (2min) — KIPP Northern California's Advocacy and Community Engagement Manager expressed concern that KIPP Excellencia and other charter schools received no projects in the highest-priority (91–100) IOQ rating category despite documented facility needs, and asked the board to revisit the rating process to ensure equitable treatment of all students.
9.1Facilities Master Plan UpdateDiscussion
Item details
Rationale: Since June 2024, the District has undertaken a comprehensive Facilities Master Planning (FMP) process to assess its facilities' physical condition, educational adequacy, and long-term capacity needs. The FMP aims to inform capital planning decisions by establishing a data-driven, prioritized roadmap for facilities investments over the next 8 to 10 years. This process has been guided by an integrated planning framework that includes: Facility Condition Assessments (FCA): Detailed evaluations of infrastructure systems, building components, and site conditions across all 15 school campuses and support facilities. Demographic and Enrollment Projections: Enrollment forecasts through 2030 were developed with a demographer to evaluate space needs and inform long-range capacity planning. Educational Adequacy Reviews: Analysis of existing learning environments against the District’s Educational Specifications and 21st-century instructional models, including classroom configuration, technology readiness, and support spaces. Stakeholder Engagement: Structured input gathered through community town halls, school site committee meetings, stakeholder interviews, staff surveys, and site walkthroughs, ensuring the plan reflects local priorities and programmatic needs. Financial Alignment: Coordination of project planning with available and anticipated funding sources, including Measure S bond funds, state facility program eligibility, and local developer fees. The resulting Draft FMP serves as a strategic framework to guide project prioritization, inform capital allocation, and support the implementation of equitable and future-ready facilities across the District. Purpose of the Board Item: This Board item presents a comprehensive Draft Facilities Master Plan for Board review and feedback, while community and stakeholder comments continue to be received. Staff will return to the Board in June with a final version of the FMP that identifies and summarizes changes between this draft and the version proposed for adoption. Topics for Discussion Include: Summary of Key Findings: Current facility conditions and identified deficiencies District-wide facilities needs compared to available funding Community and Stakeholder Input Summary: Key themes and priorities raised during outreach Summary of feedback by stakeholder group Project Prioritization Criteria: Review of Indicators of Quality (IoQ) rubric and sample project scores for input and alignment with feedback and priorities Input on areas of highest need across the District Review of Draft FMP Sections: High-level review of each school site’s FMP section Estimated costs and potential phasing strategies Board questions and feedback Next Steps: Continue collecting and reviewing final community and stakeholder comments Incorporate Board feedback into the Draft Facilities Master Plan Bring a finalized version of the FMP to the Board in June for adoption, with a summary of changes from this draft Begin developing implementation strategies, timelines, and project delivery plans Financial Impact: There is no immediate financial impact. However, the Facilities Master Plan will guide the prioritization and allocation of funds from Measure S and other local and state capital resources. Due to the file size limitation of BoardDocs, the Draft FMP can be accessed through the following link: https://bit.ly/rcsd-fmp25-draft Submission for Approval Prepared by: Rick Edson, CBO; Martin Cervantes, Interim Bond Director; Quattrocci Kwok Architects (Aaron Jobson, John Dybczak, and Ector Mojica); VPCS, Bond Program Managers (Nick Olsen and Eric Van Pelt) Approved by: John Baker, Superintendent §
1049:53Approval of Bond Program Consent Items1min
10.1Approval of Measure T and Measure S Bond Program Legal Services Agreement with DWKAction (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: The Redwood City School District seeks to appoint the law firm Dannis Woliver Kelley (DWK) to provide legal representation, advice, and counsel related to the Measure T and Measure S Bond Construction Programs, effective July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, and continuing thereafter as mutually agreed. This appointment specifically excludes bond issuance services such as bond counsel and disclosure counsel. The total cost for legal services under this agreement shall not exceed $150,000. The maximum authorized amount may be amended upon mutual agreement of the parties. As part of the agreement, DWK will provide periodic legal updates on relevant legislation, court rulings, and other legal developments. DWK is also required to maintain current and active legal malpractice insurance throughout the term of the agreement. Financial Impact: Not to exceed $150,000, to be paid from the Bond Program. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Rick Edson, Chief Business Official, and Martin Cervantes, Interim Bond Program Director Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
1150:24Bond Program Action Items
1250:24School/Community Reports30min
12.1Special Education Study - Implementation UpdateReports
Item details
Rationale: A Special Education Study (12/21/23) conducted by School Services of California (SSC) in Fall 2023 was presented to the Board on 04/17/24 based on the study recommendation to develop a three year plan. Maeve Mulholland, Director of Special Education, presented year 1 plan for 2024-2025 school year. The Study implementation focused on four key areas: i) Organizational Structure and Compliance ii) Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) iii) Effective Instructional Programs iv) Culture of Inclusion. In the presentation today, Director Mulholland will provide an update on the Study implementation plan. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Maeve Mulholland, Ed.D., Director of Special Education Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
13Discussion Items30min
13.11:52:19Discussion on California School Boards Association Policy Development WorkshopDiscussion
Item details
Rationale: This item is to discuss next steps to processing and updating 360+ board policies, bylaws, and exhibits in the district's board policy manual. As of April 2025, (73.5%) of the bylaws, board policies, and exhibits in Redwood City School District (RCSD) board policy manual are either missing or outdated compared to the California School Boards Association (CSBA) sample policy manual. Additionally, there are 255 administrative regulations for staff to review. The total is approximately 650 items. RCSD is currently subscribed to GAMUT Policy, an online policy information service through the CSBA. As subscribers, RCSD can participate in a comprehensive Policy Development Workshop (PDW) to develop a new policy manual or have comprehensive updates to their existing policy manual to help address key issues and achieve compliance with state and federal mandates. The 2-3 day on-site workshop pairs the knowledge and experience of district administrators and board members with the expertise of a CSBA consultant to generate a clear, user-friendly policy manual that complies with state and federal law and meets local needs. The timeline and process of how the updated board policies and administrative regulations will need to be discussed via the School Board. With an amount this large to consider, how would the Board like to proceed in eventually considering approval? Financial Impact: $10,105 out of the General Fund Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
13.22:13:04First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy/Administrative Regulation 6158: Independent StudyDiscussion
Item details
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 6158: Independent Study This policy has been updated to reflect SB 153 and AB 176, which require a district that submits an affidavit for a school closure necessitated by an emergency condition. For an emergency event occurring after September 1, 2021, but before July 1, 2026, this policy certifies that the district has a plan for offering independent study to affected students within 10 instructional days. For events occurring on or after July 1, 2026, this policy certifies that an instructional continuity plan is included in the district’s comprehensive safety plan and that the district offered student engagement and instruction consistent with the instructional continuity plan or certify that it did not do so due to extenuating circumstances. Additionally, SB 153 provides that when computing average daily attendance for apportionment purposes, students participating in independent study may only be credited with one day of attendance for each calendar day. The changes reflected also makes specified independent study requirements applicable only when students are participating in an independent study program for 16 school days or more in a school year. The board policy also provides that evidence of student participation, in addition to other forms of evidence, may include documentation that the student participated in an instructional period either visually or verbally. SB 153 provides that a written agreement is required for independent study of any length of duration and requires districts to obtain a signed written agreement for an independent study program of more than 15 school days before the beginning of independent study, and for an independent study program of 15 school days or fewer, during the school year in which the independent study program takes place, which also makes similar changes to course-based independent study. In addition, AB 176 clarifies that the district is required to maintain documentation of hours or fraction of an hour for both student work products and the time that the student engaged in asynchronous instruction. This policy has also been updated to reflect SB 348 which requires districts to make available, at no cost, a nutritionally adequate breakfast and lunch to any district student who requests a meal including an independent study student who is scheduled for educational activities, as defined in law, lasting for two or more hours at a school site, resource center, meeting space, or other satellite facility, regardless of the student’s eligibility for a free or reduced-price meal, and to clarify the meaning of “caregiver” in the context of general independent study agreement requirements to make consistent with similar material related to course-based independent study agreement requirements. This board policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. Revisions resulted from changes from California School Boards Association and suggestions from Redwood City School District staff. The administrative regulation has been added for reference only. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
13.32:15:18First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy/Administrative Regulation/Exhibit 1312.3 Uniform Complaint ProceduresDiscussion
Item details
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss board policy, administrative regulation, exhibit 1312.3 Uniform Complaint Procedures and administrative regulation and exhibit 1312.4 Williams Uniform Complaint Procedures. Board Policy 1312.3 has been updated to reflect new Federal Regulations (89 Fed. Reg. 33474) that provides a district with knowledge of alleged conduct, which occurs in a district program or activity on or after August 1, 2024, that reasonably may constitute sex discrimination under Title IX, including sex-based harassment. This follows Title IX grievance procedures when investigating and resolving a complaint based on the alleged conduct. The policy was also updated to clarify that discrimination on the basis of sex, including sex-based harassment, for the purpose of Title IX includes sex stereotypes; sex characteristics; gender identity; sexual orientation; pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or lactation, including related medical conditions or recovery; and parental, marital, and family status. Additionally, this policy has been updated to reflect SB 153, which prohibits the Governing Board from adopting or approving the use of any textbook, instructional material, supplemental instructional material, or curriculum for classroom instruction if the use would subject a student to unlawful discrimination in accordance with specified state law. In addition, this policy is updated to clarify that the uniform complaint procedures should not be used to investigate and resolve employment discrimination complaints. This board policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. Revisions resulted from changes from California School Boards Association and suggestions from Redwood City School District staff. The administrative regulation has been added for reference only. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
13.42:17:51First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 6020: Parent InvolvementDiscussion
Item details
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 6020: Parent Involvement. The updates on this policy are in compliance with the Federal Program Monitoring office of the California Department of Education (CDE). This board policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. Revisions resulted from CDE and suggestions from Redwood City School District staff. There are no new CSBA updates. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
13.52:19:28First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy/Administrative Regulation/Exhibit 1312.2 Complaints Concerning Instructional MaterialsDiscussion
Item details
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss board policy and exhibit 1312.2 Complaints Concerning Instructional Materials California School Boards Association has updated this policy to reflect SB 153, which prohibits the Governing Board from adopting or approving the use of any textbook, instructional material, supplemental instructional material, or curriculum for classroom instruction if the use would subject a student to unlawful discrimination in accordance with specified state law. This is a new board policy for Redwood City School District and was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. The administrative regulation has been added for reference only. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
13.62:20:37First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 0450: Comprehensive Safety PlanDiscussion
Item details
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss board policy 0450: Comprehensive Safety Plan. This policy has been updated to reference SB 323, which authorizes a school employee, a student's parent/guardian or educational rights holder, or a student, at specified times, to bring concerns about an individual student's ability to access disaster safety procedures described in the comprehensive safety plan to the principal, and if there is merit to the concern requires the principal to make appropriate modifications. This policy also requires comprehensive safety plans to include adaptations for students with disabilities in accordance with the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Additionally, this policy has been updated to clarify that portions of the comprehensive safety plan that include tactical response to criminal incidents are not required to, but may be, publicly disclosed. This board policy was reviewed by the Board Policy Committee. Revisions resulted from changes from California School Boards Association and suggestions from Redwood City School District staff. The administrative regulation has been added for reference only. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
142:22:19Approval of Consent Items1min
14.1Approval of the April 2 Board Meeting MinutesAction (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: The board minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, the Superintendent, and Administration. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Evelyn Campos, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
14.2Approval of the May 8 Special Board Meeting MinutesAction (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: The board minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, the Superintendent, and the Administration. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Evelyn Campos, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
14.3Approval of the May 14 Board Meeting MinutesAction (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: The board minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, the Superintendent, and the Administration. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Evelyn Campos, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
14.4Approval of Shade Installation at Two Year-Round California State Preschool Program (CSPP) SitesAction (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: Outdoor Play is a vital daily part of Early Childhood Education programs. However, unprotected sun exposure, particularly during the peak summer months, poses serious health and safety risks, including sunburn, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. Installing durable and aesthetically pleasing shade structures will significantly improve the outdoor learning environment at Garfield CDC and Roosevelt CDC where there is currently insufficient protection from the elements for children and staff. The installation of shade structures at these two-year-round State Preschool sites will significantly reduce health and safety risks, aligning the school district's State Preschool program with CDE’s strong commitment to the holistic well-being of children, families, and staff. On Friday, May 16, 2025, the California Department of Education Early Education Division approved the use of the California State Preschool Program (CSPP) AB 110 grant funds toward shade structure installation at the two aforementioned CDC sites. Financial Impact: $68,825 to be charged against CSPP's remaining 1.6 million dollars in AB 110 grant funds. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Edna Carmona, CDC Principal Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
14.5Approval of Kennedy’s Field Trip Request to Italy, June 7, 2025, through June 16, 2025Action (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: The purpose of this international field trip is to immerse participating students in the Italian language and culture. This experience is designed to provide authentic, real-world opportunities to enhance language proficiency and deepen students’ cultural understanding through direct engagement. The anticipated outcomes of the Italy field trip include enhanced Italian language proficiency through daily immersion and structured lessons, as well as a deeper understanding of Italian culture and increased global awareness. Students will also develop important interpersonal and independence skills by engaging in travel and living with host families. Overall, the experience offers meaningful real-world learning opportunities that directly support and enrich the school’s academic curriculum. Financial Impact: This activity will be funded by student fundraising efforts, Kennedy PTO, and the RCSD General Fund. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Chandra Leonardo, Principal, and Shanna Laney, Vice Principal Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
14.6Approval of Agreement with GoGuardian for a new Content Filter, Classroom Management tool and Alert System for Students' SafetyAction (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: As digital learning plays a central role in education, our district must implement technology solutions that ensure student safety and compliance with federal regulations (e.g., Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA), E-Rate) and empower educators to streamline digital classroom management. Multiple solutions were evaluated as part of a comprehensive review process, with GoGuardian emerging as the most effective and aligned option. After thoroughly assessing our current solution, Securly and Blocksi, and conducting a detailed comparison with GoGuardian and other platforms, we recommend transitioning to GoGuardian to better support our instructional goals, IT efficiency, and student well-being. GoGuardian Content Filtering GoGuardian provides robust, real-time web filtering that is both adaptive and customizable. Unlike Securly, GoGuardian offers more granular control over filtering policies at the user, group, and organizational levels. It also features: AI-Powered Filtering: Utilizes artificial intelligence to analyze and block harmful content, including explicit material, across various platforms and applications Granular Control: This feature allows administrators to set specific filtering rules based on categories, individual students, or devices, ensuring tailored safety measures. Real Time Monitoring: Provides live visibility into student browsing activity, enabling immediate intervention when necessary. Proxy Smart Alerts: Proactively scan for and detect websites with proxy elements GoGuardian Teacher GoGuardian Teacher provides a powerful classroom management tool that is tightly integrated with the content filter. This solution replaces Blocksi for classroom management. Teachers can: View students' screens in real time Push websites to all students' devices Lock screens and manage student attention Set screens (preset browsing environments) for different lessons or tests Student Reports: Pull historic reports of student activity in teachers' classes, such as URLs visited, screenshots, number of times a tab was closed, etc. GoGuardian Beacon GoGuardian Beacon is a critical tool in identifying students who may be experiencing mental health challenges, including potential self-harm or suicidal ideation. Beacon leverages advanced AI to flag concerning behavior patterns across search queries, browsing history, and written content. Real-time alerts can be routed to counselors, administrators, or other designated personnel. Customizable alert levels and escalation protocols allow for a tailored response system. Historical insights help mental health staff proactively support at-risk students. Financial Impact: GoGuardian : $138,800 total over 3 years (approximately $46,267 per year) Current (Securly + Blocksi) : $48,988 per year Estimated Annual Savings : $2,721 Funding Source : General Fund (Fund 01) Submission for Approval Prepared by: Carlos Reyna, Director of Technology Reviewed by: Rick Edson, Chief Business Official Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
15Action Items40min
15.12:22:38Consideration and Approval of Multitudes as the Dyslexia and Reading Difficulties Screening Tool for Grades K-2Action (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: In accordance with California Education Code Section 53008, beginning in the 2025–2026 school year, all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to implement a universal screening tool to identify students in kindergarten through second grade who may be at risk for reading difficulties, including dyslexia. In December 2024, the California Department of Education (CDE), in collaboration with the Reading Difficulties Risk Screener Selection Panel (RDRSSP), approved four screening tools for this purpose: Amira – Available in English and Spanish; Grades K–2 mCLASS with DIBELS 8th Edition and mCLASS Lectura – Available in English and Spanish; Grades K–2 Multitudes – Developed by UCSF; Available in English and Spanish; Grades K–2 Rapid Online Assessment of Reading (ROAR) – Developed by Stanford; English only; Grades 1–2 LEAs are required to adopt one or more of these screening instruments by June 30, 2025, during a public meeting of their governing board. Full implementation of screening for students in kindergarten and grades one and two must begin in the 2025–2026 school year. Of the four state-approved Reading Difficulties Risk Screener tools, the Redwood City School District has selected Multitudes. Multitudes, developed by the UCSF Dyslexia Center, is a state-funded, computer-adaptive screener available in both English and Spanish. It is designed to provide early, reliable insights into students’ reading development and risk factors associated with dyslexia. Purpose for Dyslexia Screening Adoption Research shows that early identification of dyslexia and other reading difficulties significantly increases the effectiveness of intervention. When students are identified in early grades K-2, they are more likely to develop foundational reading skills and avoid the compounding effects of delayed literacy. Screening all students ensures that identification is not dependent on parent advocacy or external assessments, which can vary widely based on socioeconomic status or language proficiency. Universal screening helps close opportunity gaps by ensuring that all students, especially English Learners and students from underserved communities, are assessed for risk factors. Reading difficulties screening supports evidence-based reading instruction aligned with the Science of Reading. It helps educators understand which students need targeted phonological and phonemic awareness instruction, a core component of reading development. CA now mandates early screening for reading difficulties, including dyslexia. Implementing a screening protocol helps the LEA remain compliant with current or anticipated legislation and ensures readiness for evolving state education policy. Screening data enhances the effectiveness of a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) by allowing schools to place students in appropriate instructional tiers quickly. It enables educators to deliver timely and differentiated interventions based on student need. Intervening early reduces the long-term need for intensive special education services. Addressing reading difficulties before they become entrenched leads to better academic outcomes and reduces the social-emotional toll of repeated failure. Financial Impact: $2,200 out of the Literacy Screening Grant (One-time funding) Submission for Approval Prepared by: Anna Herrera, Assistant Superintendent Ed. Services Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
15.22:40:16Approval of the School Plans for Student Achievement (SPSAs) for Hoover, McKinley, Kennedy, North Star Academy, and Roy CloudAction (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: State accountability initiatives require districts to write a three-year Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) that is developed with stakeholders to establish goals, actions, and services for the students in their district. Aligned with the LCAP goals, each school site writes/updates yearly School Plans for Student Achievement (SPSA) that operationalize how each goal is met and how related actions and services are funded at each site. RCSD 2024-2027 LCAP goals are: 1. By June of 2027, every student in the RCSD will receive appropriate social-emotional support designed to meet their needs in an inclusive and supportive environment through the implementation of the Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) framework. By June of 2027, the LEA aims to reduce Chronic Absenteeism by 3% each year in all student groups across the LEA, specifically the African American Students and student groups at English learners at Clifford, Henry Ford. Improve the Attendance rate by 2% each year in all groups. Reduce suspensions by 0.5% for district and other subgroups: SED, ELs, Homeless, each year, and by 1% annually for African Americans, and Students with Disabilities, subgroup of English Learners LTELs. 2. By June of 2027, 55% of 2nd-8th grade English Learner (EL) students will progress by a minimum of one level on the ELPAC each school year as measured by the Summative ELPAC Assessment. Increase our reclassification rate to 20%. Decrease our Long Term English Learner to 10% 3. By June of 2027, all RCSD students will increase at least 4% annually in ELA and Math on iReady, the district's local assessment program. English learner students in grades 3-8 will increase in meeting or exceeding the standard in ELA to 20% and in Math to 16% on the CAASPP, the state assessment program. Components of the SPSA : There are some basic requirements of each site that has been designated as a Schoolwide Program for Title I funding: Information on the academic achievement of students A description of the strategies designed to: provide opportunities for all students, including meeting state standards strengthening the academic program address the needs of all students, particularly those at risk of not meeting state standards For all district sites, the SPSA is used as the tool for schoolwide planning, with input and approval from the School Site Council (SSC). Metrics have been aligned with the LCAP and targets have been set by each site for improvement in the areas of suspension, chronic absenteeism, reclassification of English Learners, and achievement in reading and mathematics. Financial Impact: Described in each site budget. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Anna Herrera, Assistant Superintendent, Ed. Services Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
15.32:41:48Approval of Personnel ReportAction (Consent)
Item details
Rationale: The attached Personnel Report includes personnel recommended for hire, personnel requesting leave of absence, and personnel leaving employment. Financial Impact: All positions are approved in the 2024-2025 budget. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
162:43:18Board and Superintendent Reports10min
16.1Report from Board Members and SuperintendentReports
Item details
Rationale: The School Board and Superintendent Baker will report out on meetings, attended events, upcoming events, school site visits, etc. Financial Impact: None at this moment. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Evelyn Campos, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent
172:47:30Information1min
17.1Information on San Mateo County Investment Fund - April 2025Information
Item details
Rationale: Pursuant to Education Code Sections 41001 and 41002, all funds received by or apportioned to a school district must be deposited into the county treasury and credited to the appropriate district fund. In accordance with Education Code Section 41015, a school district may invest all or a portion of the funds held in a Special Reserve Fund, as well as any surplus monies not immediately needed for operational purposes, in authorized investments outlined in Government Code Sections 16430 and 53601. Historically, school districts in San Mateo County, including this District, have deposited all funds with the County Treasury. The County Treasurer has managed investment decisions on behalf of the districts, a practice that is common throughout California. These district funds are pooled with those of other public agencies in the County Investment Pool, with earnings and losses distributed proportionally based on each participant’s investment share. Financial Impact: Gross pool earnings for Month ending April 30, 2025: 3.992 % The current average maturity of the portfolio is 2.20 years, with an average duration of 1.97 years. The portfolio continues to hold no derivative products. Please click the link below to view the investment report for the April 2025 Month End Report: https://www.smcgov.org/media/154094/download?inline= Please click the link below to view the copies of the Investment Reports and the Compliance Reports: https://www.smcgov.org/treasurer/investment-information Submission for Approval Prepared by: Rick Edson, Chief Business Official Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
182:47:35Correspondence1min
18.1CorrespondenceInformation
Item details
§
192:48:41Other Business/Suggested Items For Future Agenda1min
19.1Possible Other Business/Suggested Items for Future AgendaInformation
Item details
Rationale: The following Schedule of Agenda Items for the 2024-25 School Board meetings (attached hereto) has been revised by the administration. This schedule of board agenda items will be routinely updated, as needed. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Evelyn Campos, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
202:48:52Board Meetings Calendar1min
20.1Changes to the Board Meetings CalendarInformation
Item details
Rationale: The following School Board Meetings Calendar for 2024-25 (attached hereto) has been revised by the administration. This calendar of school board meetings will be routinely updated, as needed. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Evelyn Campos, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
212:48:53Adjournment1min
21.1Adjourn the MeetingAction