10:02Call to Order
1.1Roll CallProcedural
20:31Welcome
2.1Welcome by the School Board President, Alisa MacAvoyProcedural
32:13Changes to the Agenda
3.1Additions, Deletions or Modifications to the agenda.Discussion
45:20Approval of Agenda
4.1Approval of AgendaAction
56:03Oral Communication
5.1If you have public comment related to a Regular Board Meeting item, please post it on the links available under Public Content prior to the Regular Board Meeting or immediately upon the meeting opening.Information
Detalles del punto
Public Comment Links: English: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSexN3rAtNYJrhCjKT0s9AG__Eq0-_iAUFPI6ID3Mo0Jn8yeGA/viewform?usp=sf_link Spanish: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScMO3Wo8kjGmJF7KNhihQqanOLfzfoyQ7IT904jU9QtFFF28Q/viewform?usp=sf_link
66:03School/Community Reports
6.16:03Citizens’ Measure T Oversight Committee FY 2019-20 Annual ReportReports
Detalles del punto
Rationale: On November 3, 2015, Measure T was passed by the voters and authorized the Board of Trustees of the Redwood City School District to issue up to $193 million in general obligation bonds for the purpose of renovating aging classrooms and science labs for 21 st -century learning and provide flexible classrooms and labs for science and other core academics; updating school libraries, classroom computers, and instructional technology at all schools; fix and replace deteriorating roofs, remove aging and unsafe portable buildings, and improve school fire and earthquake safety; replace old, outdated and inefficient electrical, plumbing, heating, and ventilation systems; and provide dedicated classrooms for music, art, and performing arts electives. Pursuant to legal requirements, and as specified in the Full Ballot Text, the Board required that the District establish an Independent Citizens Bond Oversight Committee as a public accountability measure to ensure that bond proceeds are expended only for the school facilities projects described in the Bond Project List. In accordance with the resolution passed by the Board, at its February 10, 2016, and March 23, 2016, regular meeting, the Board appointed an independent Measure T Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee. Since its inception, the Committee has met on fifteen occasions. All meetings are open to the public and the primary focus is to confirm that Measure T bond proceeds are expended in a manner consistent with the original ballot language. In September 2016, Series A of the bond authorization was issued, which consisted of current interest bonds with an initial par value of $60 million, with stated interest rates of 2% to 4% and maturing through August 2041. In March 2018, Series B of the bond authorization was issued, which consisted of current interest bonds with an initial par value of $67 million, with stated interest rates of 4% to 5% and maturing through 2040. In October 2019, the last series of the bond authorization, Series C, was issued for an aggregate principal amount of $66 million. General Obligation Bond Series C consisted of Series 2019C (Tax-Exempt) for $41.5 million with stated interest rates of 2.6% to 4% and maturing through 2041, Series 2019C-1 (Federally Taxable) for $16.0 million with stated interest rates of 1.8% to 2.4% and maturing through 2029 and SeriesC-1 (Tax-Exempt Technology) for $8.5 million with stated interest rates of 3%-4% and maturing in August 2022. Expenditures in FY 2019-20 totaled $33,320,994 and included $363,557 in salaries and benefits; $32,308,949 in capital outlay; $81,204 in materials; $155,234 in non-capitalized equipment; and $412,050 in services and other expenditures. At the September 23, 2021, meeting, the Measure T Citizen’s Bond Oversight Committee approved the FY 2019-20 Annual Report and reported that, to the best of its knowledge, the District expended Measure T General Obligation Bond funds only for the specific projects approved by the voters, in accordance with Proposition 39 and outlined in Article XIIIA, Section 1 (b)(3)(C) of the California Constitution. Financial Impact: Please refer to the attached annual report. Submission for Approval: Prepared by: Michael Bolander, Chair, Measure T Citizen's Bond Oversight Committee Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
6.211:35Review of the Human Resource Department's Vision and Plans for 2021-22Information
Detalles del punto
Rationale: The Human Resources Department has worked to implement the newly adopted Equity Goals from Board Policy 0415. Tonight's presentation will provide an overview of staffing, equity work in the department, data points, and goals for the 2021-22 year. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent and Erin Kekos, Director of Human Resources Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
742:09Bond Program Consent Items
7.1Approval of Consent ItemsAction
Detalles del punto
§
7.2Approval of Maker Space Window Replacement Proposal for Kennedy Middle School with Golden Bay GlassAction (Consent)
Detalles del punto
Rationale: Golden Bay Glass will be replacing the Maker Space classroom windows with new, clear windows. Financial Impact: Total — $35,831. Within budget. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Don Dias, Bond Program Director Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
7.3Approval of Curb and Gutter Proposal for Garfield School with Casey FogliAction (Consent)
Detalles del punto
Rationale: Casey Fogli will be handling the offsite concrete curb and gutter scope at Garfield School. Financial Impact: Total — $58,400. Within budget. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Don Dias, Bond Program Director Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
7.4Approval of Administration Building Turf and Pavers Proposal for Clifford School with ScapesAction (Consent)
Detalles del punto
Rationale: Scapes will be installing new artifical turf and pavers in the dirt areas in front of the Administration Building at Clifford School. Financial Impact: Total — $23,600. Within budget. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Don Dias, Bond Program Director Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
7.5Approval of Rear Parking Lot Design Proposal for Garfield School with HEDAction (Consent)
Detalles del punto
Rationale: HED will be handling the design and construction administration services for the new rear parking lot at Garfield School. Financial Impact: Total — $61,500 with reimbursable allowance. Within budget. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Don Dias, Bond Program Director Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
7.6Approval of Modernization & New Buildings Project Change Order #7 for Orion Alternative School with Sausal CorporationAction (Consent)
Detalles del punto
Rationale: Orion Alternative School Modernization & New Building Project Bid Package G Change Order #7 includes seven potential change order (PCO), as follows: PCO-041.2 – Additional cost for Multi-use Building plumbing rough-in – $4,957.18 PCO-055.1 – Additional cost due to Sunshade bracket connection revision – $24,462.83 PCO-056.2 – Installation of metal stud soffit and drywall finish in Lobby– $3,495.77 PCO-059 – Cost incurred for repair, finishing and re-installation of doors due to new hardware installation– $6,830.03 PCO-061.1 – Additional concrete pouring required over Building A metal deck – $947.09 PCO-063 – Additional cost due to channel elevations and form deck edge revisions – $5,381.43 PCO-065 – Furnishing and installation of 18” 18ga steel plates at F line – $4,293.47 Financial Impact: Total — $50,367.80. Within budget. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Don Dias, Bond Program Director Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Our adopted rules of Parliamentary Procedure, Robert’s Rules, provide for a consent agenda listing several items for approval of the Board by a single motion. Most of the items listed under the consent agenda have gone through Board subcommittee review and recommendation. Documentation concerning these items has been provided to all board members and the public in advance to assure an extensive and thorough review. Items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. §
8Bond Program Action Items
8.142:38Approval of Turnkey Security Camera and Intrusion System Agreement for Garfield, Orion Alternative (Formerly John Gill), and Taft Schools with SiemensAction
Detalles del punto
Rationale: Siemens will be handling the turnkey installation and programming of the new security camera and intrusion systems at Garfield, Orion Alternative (Formerly John Gill), and Taft Schools. Financial Impact: Total — $1,997,228.79. Within budget. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Don Dias, Bond Program Director Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
8.243:34Approval of Additional Covid-19 Safety Compliance Officer (SCO) Services Amendment #2 for All Active Construction Sites with The Safety GuysAction
Detalles del punto
Rationale: The Safety Guys will continue to provide the required Covid-19 safety compliance officer (SCO) services for all active construction sites. These service keep our active construction sites safe and open during the pandemic. Financial Impact: Total — $700,000 additional allowance. Requested movement from the Program Contingency to the Program Administration Project. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Don Dias, Bond Program Director Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
8.345:58Adoption of Resolution 11, Approval of New Buildings, Modernization and Sitework Project Change Order #4 and Futility Resolution for Taft School with Sanco PipelinesAction
Detalles del punto
Rationale: Taft Community School New Buildings, Modernization & Sitework Project Bid Package B Change Order #4 includes one potential change order (PCO), as follows: PCO-005 – Re-route of pre-existing utilities due to conflict with footings - $93,520.28 This change order, if approved, will push this contract over the allowable 10% change order contingency, and we have therefore included a futility resolution to accompany this action. The futility resolution explains that it would have cost the District more money and created scheduling and coordination issues if they would have re-bid this additional scope to a new contractor rather than proceeding with the contractor that has already mobilized and is currently on site handling the construction. Financial Impact: $93,520.28. Within budget. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Don Dias, Bond Program Director Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
9Discussion Items
9.147:28Discussion of Requiring Covid-19 Vaccination for Employees and Eligible RCSD Students and Letter to Governor Gavin Newsom Urging the Requirement of Covid-19 Vaccinations for StudentsDiscussion
Cameron (4min) — Thanked the board for discussing vaccines, supported vaccine clinics, urged the district to clarify and enforce its existing extracurricular vaccine requirement for eligible students (12+), plan for the upcoming 5-11 age group, and address unvaccinated staff participation in indoor extracurricular and overnight activities.
Detalles del punto
Rationale: The COVID-19 pandemic has tragically claimed the lives of more than 600,000 Americans during the last 18 months. Currently, the Delta variant is sweeping across the nation, which has caused infection rates locally and nationally to return to levels not seen since last winter. Nationwide, hospitalization rates for COVID-19 are much higher for individuals who were unvaccinated compared to those who are vaccinated, and vaccinated individuals who do get breakthrough infections with the SARS-COV-2 virus are much more likely to have only mild symptoms. The vast majority of RCSD employees have been vaccinated after vaccines were first made aware in late 2020. Many organizations, in both the public and private sectors, are now requiring vaccination. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective in children 12-years of age and older. The Pfizer Vaccine is due for final approval for children ages 5-11 years old by the end of September. In response to the possibility of vaccine approval for younger children, school districts in San Mateo County and throughout the Bay Area and California are moving forward with plans on if and how to require eligible students to be vaccinated. No action is recommended for the School Board to take as this is a discussion item. I encourage the Trustees to discuss the following: Should RCSD require for employees and eligible students to be vaccinated Should RCSD join other San Mateo County school districts, which have started to advocate for the State to mandate vaccination The School Board and Superintendent Baker will also discuss a letter to Governor Gavin Newsom in an effort to urge the requirement of Covid-19 vaccinations for students. Financial Impact: None at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
9.21:03:04First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4112.2 - CertificationDiscussion
Detalles del punto
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4112.2 - Certification. This policy has been updated to clarify the hiring hierarchy if the district is unable to hire a person who possesses a clear or preliminary credential, including one who is approved for a limited assignment option. The policy reflects recent Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC) Coded Correspondence stating that, if the district needs to hire a person who has been granted a credential waiver by the CTC, that person must qualify for a "variable term waiver". The policy also expands the section on "National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification" to add examples of incentives that may encourage teacher participation. All Board policies originate from the California School Boards Association. This policy has been discussed by the Policy Committee. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the School District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
9.31:06:11First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 4216 - Probationary Permanent StatusDiscussion
Detalles del punto
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 4216 - Probationary Permanent Status. This policy is new to Redwood City School District. It was updated by CSBA to reflect new law AB 1353 which shortens the length of the probationary period in non-merit system districts from one year to either six months or 130 days of paid service, whichever is longer, for consistency with districts incorporating the merit system. The policy was also revised to clarify that employees may be dismissed during the probationary period without cause. All Board policies originate from the California School Boards Association. This policy has been discussed by the Policy Committee. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the School District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
9.41:07:09First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 5132 - Dress and GroomingDiscussion
Detalles del punto
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5132 - Dress and Grooming. This policy was updated to address communication of the dress code to students and staff; grant enforcement authority to the principal or designee; prohibit discriminatory enforcement of the dress code, including, but not limited to, discrimination based on gender identity, gender expression, or religious or cultural observance; and address disciplinary action for repeated violations or refusal to comply with the dress code. The policy also provides that the determination of specific items of clothing defined as gang apparel shall be free from bias based on race, ethnicity, national origin, immigration status, or other protected characteristics. The policy was also updated to reflect new law SB 188 which prohibits discrimination against traits historically associated with race, including hair texture and "protective hairstyles" such as braids, locks, and twists. The administrative regulation was updated to provide general, gender-neutral guidelines for the dress code that may be revised to reflect district practice; add circumstances under which the dress code should be modified for classes, activities, or individual students; and call for collaboration with law enforcement agencies to update definitions of gang-related apparel. All Board policies originate from the California School Boards Association. This policy has been discussed by the Policy Committee. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the School District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
9.51:08:29First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 5142.2 - Safe Routes to School ProgramDiscussion
Detalles del punto
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5142.2 - Safe Routes to School Program. This is not a new policy, but it is new for the Redwood City School District. It has recently been updated by CSBA to clarify potential liability issues, recognize that active transportation positively impacts student achievement, add material regarding equitable access and opportunity to participate in the district's safe routes to school program, and update information about state and federal grant programs. The administrative regulation reflects current strategies recommended by the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration and National Center for Safe Routes to School to improve student safety along routes to school and to promote walking, bicycling, and forms of active transport to school. All Board policies originate from the California School Boards Association. This policy has been discussed by the Policy Committee. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the School District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
9.61:10:36First Reading and Discussion of Board Policy 6020 - Parent InvolvementDiscussion
Detalles del punto
Rationale: It is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board read and discuss Board Policy 6020 - Parent Involvement. This policy has been updated to reflect the requirements to work with parents/guardians and family members to jointly develop the district's parent involvement policy and to include strategies for family engagement in the local control and accountability plan (LCAP). For districts that receive federal Title IV funding for family engagement programs, the policy also adds the requirement to inform parents/guardians and organizations of the existence of the program. This policy also contains material formerly in the AR regarding the inclusion of the Title I local educational agency plan into the LCAP and the distribution of the district and school-level parent involvement policies. The administrative regulation is currently under review by staff and the Policy Committee. All Board policies originate from the California School Boards Association. This policy has been discussed by the Policy Committee. Financial Impact: No financial impact to the School District at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Wendy Kelly, Deputy Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
101:12:02Consent Items
10.1Approval of Consent ItemsAction
Detalles del punto
§
10.2Approval of August 27th Board MinutesAction
Detalles del punto
Rationale: The board minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, the Superintendent, and Administration. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Eliana García, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
10.3Approval of September 1st Board MinutesAction
Detalles del punto
Rationale: The board minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, the Superintendent, and Administration. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Eliana García, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
10.4Approval of September 3rd Board MinutesAction
Detalles del punto
Rationale: The board minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, the Superintendent, and Administration. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Eliana García, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
10.5Approval of September 27th Board MinutesAction
Detalles del punto
Rationale: The board minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, the Superintendent, and Administration. Financial Impact: None. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Eliana García, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
10.6Approval of Nomination of Parent Elena Levina to The San Mateo County SELPA’s Community Advisory Committee/Resource Parent CouncilAction
Detalles del punto
Rationale: The Individuals with Disabilities Act articulates the legislative intent to involve parents of students with disabilities in the planning, development, and implementation of their students’ special education programs. Per California Education Code, every Special Education Local Plan Area "SELPA" is required to establish a Community Advisory Committee (CAC). The mandated role and responsibilities of the CAC are described in California Education Code. The San Mateo County SELPA group is known as the Community Advisory Committee/ Resource Parent Council (CAC/RPC). The CAC-RPC assists in advising the SELPA and the SELPA Governing Board about the SELPA Local Plan, annual priorities, parent education and other specified special education-related activities. The CAC/RPC is designed in legislative spirit and intent to establish a local forum for active parent involvement. Members are selected by their Local Education Agency, and may be nominated by their peers or staff for recommendation by the Director of Special Education. Candidates must be approved by their local Governing Board for a term of no less than 2 years. General education should be represented. (California Education Code §56191). Members should represent not only parents concerned with the quality of special education; but, the entire special education community. Members must act responsibly to ensure fair representation and a thorough evaluation of the issues and interests handled in the attainment of the goals for the SELPA. San Mateo County SELPA CAC/RPC is proud to have both general education and special education parents attend meetings, along with district staff, agency representatives and other interested community members. Meetings are open to the public, with the informational portions recorded and archived for future reference. Elena Levina is a Redwood City parent with two children in the district. She is an active member of the special education PTA "SEPTAR" and active member of the community. The Special Education Department is nominating Elena to the San Mateo County SELPA’s Community Advisory Committee/Resource Parent Council (CAC/RPC). Financial Impact: None at this time. Submission for Approval Prepared by: Patricia Pelino, Director of Special Education Approved by: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
10.7Approval of Agreement between the Redwood City School District and Redwood City Together for Fiscal Years 2020-22Action
Detalles del punto
Justificación: El acuerdo de membresía entre el Redwood City School District y Redwood City Together es una colaboración comunitaria que coordina la prestación de servicios a niños, jóvenes y familias que viven en la ciudad de Redwood City y North Fair Oaks, un área no incorporada adyacente a Redwood City. El acuerdo de servicios de membresía proporciona el liderazgo y la supervisión necesarios para desarrollar un enfoque coordinado que fortalezca los resultados académicos y sociales de los niños y jóvenes que viven dentro del área de asistencia del Redwood City School District, y brinda recursos valiosos a las familias para que puedan ser cuidadores primarios exitosos de sus hijos. Cada año desde la formación de Redwood City 2020, los socios colaboradores originales, que incluyen: City of Redwood City, Redwood City School District, Sequoia Union High School District y County of San Mateo, han renovado anualmente su membresía en Redwood City 2020, ahora Redwood City Together. Socios adicionales como: Cañada College, John W. Gardner Center for Youth and their Communities at Stanford University, Kaiser Permanente y Sequoia Healthcare District han renovado anualmente su membresía con Redwood City Together. The Chan Zuckerberg y el North Fair Oaks Community Council también se han unido a Redwood City Together. El acuerdo de membresía entre el Redwood City School District y Redwood City Together corresponde a los años fiscales 2020-22. Debido a un error administrativo, este acuerdo se presenta con retraso ante la Junta Escolar para su aprobación tardía. Impacto financiero: El Redwood City School District (RCSD) realizará una contribución de $25,000 para el año fiscal 2020-2021 y una contribución de $26,250 para el año fiscal 2021-2022. Redwood City Together facturará al RCSD $25,000 por el año fiscal 2020-2021 al momento de la firma de este acuerdo para el año fiscal 2020-2021, y $26,250 el 30 de septiembre de 2021 por el año fiscal 2021-2022. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
10.8Ratification of Warrant Register, September 1, 2021 - September 30, 2021Action
Detalles del punto
Justificación: La Sección 42631 del Código de Educación establece que todos los pagos provenientes de los fondos de un distrito escolar deberán realizarse mediante orden escrita de la junta directiva del distrito. El informe adjunto comprende los gastos de diversos fondos por un monto de $11,202,217.06 correspondientes al período del 1 de septiembre de 2021 al 30 de septiembre de 2021. Impacto financiero: El total de desembolsos de la Oficina del Tesorero del Condado de San Mateo asciende a $11,202,217.06 y representa los gastos reales de todos los fondos. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: Priscilla Aquino-Dichoso, Chief Business Official. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11Action items
11.1Adoption of Resolution 9, Urging Governor Gavin Newsom and Legislature to Require Covid-19 Vaccination for Students and Approval of Letter to Governor Gavin NewsomAction
Detalles del punto
Justificación: En un esfuerzo por instar al Gobernador Gavin Newsom y a la Legislatura a exigir la vacunación contra el Covid-19 para los estudiantes, los distritos escolares de todo el Condado de San Mateo están adoptando resoluciones y enviando cartas en apoyo de este mandato. Tal como se establece en la resolución, los estudiantes del Redwood City School District y de otros distritos escolares del condado y del estado continúan contrayendo Covid-19 o tienen contacto cercano con personas infectadas por Covid-19 y, en consecuencia, pierden días de instrucción y aprendizaje presencial. Al igual que otros distritos escolares del Condado de San Mateo y del Estado de California, el Redwood City School District ha trabajado para implementar un enfoque de múltiples capas de medidas de seguridad contra el Covid-19 con el fin de mantener seguros a los estudiantes y al personal, y evitar la propagación del Covid-19 en las escuelas. Si bien estas medidas de seguridad son eficaces para limitar la propagación del Covid-19, el California Department of Public Health, los Centers of Disease Control and Prevention y otras agencias de salud pública han manifestado que las vacunas son la forma más efectiva de prevenir el contagio y la propagación del Covid-19. El mandato de vacunación contra el Covid-19 para los estudiantes ofrece al Estado una oportunidad fundamental para mejorar la salud pública y garantizar la seguridad de los estudiantes y del personal educativo de California. Impacto financiero: Ninguno en este momento. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11.21:12:02Approval of Amendment 1 in Lieu of the Facilities Use Agreement between Redwood City School District and Connect Community Charter SchoolAction
Detalles del punto
Justificación: Debido a la interrupción en el uso de espacios para la instrucción presencial como resultado de la pandemia, el Distrito Escolar ha ofrecido a Connect Community Charter School una extensión de un año —hasta el 30 de junio de 2023— de su acuerdo de instalaciones existente en la antigua Fair Oaks Elementary School, con cambios menores para permitir que la escuela charter instale dos pequeñas estructuras portátiles adicionales en el plantel. Todos los demás términos y condiciones relacionados con el espacio permanecerán iguales. Impacto financiero: Ninguno en este momento. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11.31:12:02Approval of Amendment 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding between Redwood City School District and Connect Community Charter SchoolAction
Detalles del punto
Justificación: El 9 de julio de 2021, la Legislatura de California aprobó AB 130, un proyecto de ley presupuestario de urgencia que contenía, entre otros elementos, una extensión automática de 2 años del mandato de cada escuela charter en California cuyo período hubiera vencido entre el 1 de enero de 2022 y el 30 de junio de 2025. De conformidad con esta nueva ley, el mandato de Connect Community Charter School ha sido extendido por dos años por disposición de la ley, y ahora vencerá el 30 de junio de 2024 a menos que sea renovado. En consecuencia, el Distrito busca extender su MOU con Connect durante el período de dos años. Impacto financiero: Ninguno en este momento. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11.41:12:02Approval of Amendment 1 in Lieu of the Facilities Use Agreement between Redwood City School District and KIPP Excelencia Community PreparatoryAction
Detalles del punto
Justificación: Debido a la interrupción en el uso de espacios para la instrucción presencial como resultado de la pandemia, el Distrito ha ofrecido a KIPP Bay Area Schools una extensión de un año de su acuerdo de instalaciones existente de tres años en la antigua Fair Oaks Community School, sin ajustes y dentro de las limitaciones de matrícula existentes. Todos los demás términos y condiciones relacionados con el espacio permanecerán iguales hasta el 30 de junio de 2023. Impacto financiero: Ninguno en este momento. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11.51:12:02Approval of Amendment 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding between Redwood City School District and KIPP Excelencia Community PreparatoryAction
Detalles del punto
Justificación: El 9 de julio de 2021, la Legislatura de California aprobó AB 130, un proyecto de ley presupuestario de urgencia que contenía, entre otros elementos, una extensión automática de 2 años del mandato de cada escuela charter en California cuyo período hubiera vencido entre el 1 de enero de 2022 y el 30 de junio de 2025. De conformidad con esta nueva ley, el mandato de KIPP Excelencia Community Prep Charter School ha sido extendido por dos años por disposición de la ley, y ahora vencerá el 30 de junio de 2026 a menos que sea renovado. En consecuencia, el Distrito busca extender su MOU con KIPP durante el período de dos años. Impacto financiero: Ninguno en este momento. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11.61:12:02Approval of Amendment 1 to the Facility Use Agreement between Redwood City School District and Rocketship Redwood City PrepAction
Detalles del punto
Justificación: Debido a la interrupción en el uso de espacios para la instrucción presencial como resultado de la pandemia, el Distrito Escolar ha ofrecido a Rocketship Redwood City Prep una extensión de un año del acuerdo de instalaciones existente en la antigua Hawes Elementary School, sin ajustes y dentro de los límites de matrícula existentes. Todos los demás términos y condiciones relacionados con el espacio permanecerán iguales. Impacto financiero: Consulte el FUA para conocer el impacto financiero. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11.71:12:55Approval of Amendment 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding between Redwood City School District and Rocketship Redwood City PrepAction
Marie Alvarado-Gil (2min) — Thanked Superintendent Dr. John Baker for his resilient leadership and community-building approach during the pandemic, citing the charter school MOU amendments as an example of his fortitude.
Detalles del punto
Justificación: El 9 de julio de 2021, la Legislatura de California aprobó AB 130, un proyecto de ley presupuestario de urgencia que contenía, entre otros elementos, una extensión automática de 2 años del mandato de cada escuela charter en California cuyo período hubiera vencido entre el 1 de enero de 2022 y el 30 de junio de 2025. De conformidad con esta nueva ley, el mandato de Rocketship Redwood City Prep Charter School ha sido extendido por dos años por disposición de la ley, y ahora vencerá el 30 de junio de 2026 a menos que sea renovado. En consecuencia, el Distrito busca extender su MOU con Rocketship durante el período de extensión de dos años. Impacto financiero: Consulte el MOU para conocer el impacto financiero. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11.81:12:02Disposal of Obsolete Technology AssetAction (Consent)
Detalles del punto
Justificación: Estos dispositivos tienen 5 años o más de antigüedad, están dañados y ya no pueden utilizarse en un entorno educativo. Los Chromebooks incluidos en esta lista son más antiguos que la Google Automatic Update Expiration List (AUE) y ya no pueden utilizarse para los exámenes CAASPP o ELPAC. Los iPads incluidos en esta lista no pueden ejecutar las últimas 3 revisiones del sistema operativo (iOS). Las computadoras (Apple) incluidas en esta lista no pueden ejecutar las últimas tres revisiones del sistema operativo publicadas por Apple. Impacto financiero: Ninguno. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: Kyle Brumbaugh, Director of Technology and Innovation. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent. Nuestras reglas adoptadas de Procedimiento Parlamentario, las Reglas de Robert, establecen una agenda de consentimiento que incluye varios puntos para la aprobación de la Junta mediante una sola moción. La mayoría de los puntos enumerados en la agenda de consentimiento han pasado por la revisión y recomendación de un subcomité de la Junta. La documentación correspondiente a estos puntos ha sido proporcionada a todos los miembros de la Junta y al público con anticipación para garantizar una revisión amplia y exhaustiva. Los puntos pueden ser retirados de la agenda de consentimiento a solicitud de cualquier miembro de la Junta. §
11.91:16:03Adoption of Resolution 10, Approval of Reduction of Certain Classified Services for Fiscal Year 2021-22Action
Detalles del punto
Justificación: Debido a la reducción o discontinuación de determinados tipos de servicios de conformidad con la Sección 45117 del Código de Educación, la Junta Escolar resuelve que el número legal de empleados clasificados del distrito indicado en la Resolución 10 (adjunta) no sea recontratado para el año escolar 2021-22. Impacto financiero: Ninguno. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: Erin Kekos, Director of Human Resources. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11.101:17:22Approval of Personnel Changes for 2021-22Action
Detalles del punto
Justificación: Debido a cambios en las necesidades de personal dentro de los siguientes departamentos, se solicitan los siguientes cambios de puestos para el año 2021-22. Puestos adicionales necesarios: 1.0 Administrative Secretary III – Educación Especial. Este puesto es necesario para apoyar al Preescolar de Educación Especial. 0.75 FTE Bus Driver Type I – Departamento de Instalaciones, transporte. Este puesto es necesario para proporcionar transporte a los 24 nuevos estudiantes recién llegados al Redwood City School District. Impacto financiero: 1.0 Administrative Secretary III – $94,441. 0.75 Bus Driver Type I – $61,000. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: Erin Kekos, Director of Human Resources. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
11.111:20:23Approval of Personnel ReportAction
Detalles del punto
Justificación: El Informe de Personal adjunto incluye al personal recomendado para contratación, al personal que solicita licencia y al personal que se separa del empleo. Impacto financiero: Ninguno. Todos los puestos están aprobados en el presupuesto 2021-2022. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: Erin Kekos, Director of Human Resources. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
121:21:31Board and Superintendent Reports
12.1Report from Board Members and SuperintendentReports
Detalles del punto
Justificación: La Junta Escolar y el Superintendent Baker informarán sobre reuniones, eventos a los que asistieron, próximos eventos, visitas a planteles escolares, entre otros. Impacto financiero: Ninguno en este momento. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: Eliana García, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent
131:27:04Information
13.1Quarterly Williams Report, 1st Quarter, July 2021 through September 2021Information
Detalles del punto
Justificación: De conformidad con la Sección 35186 del Código de Educación y la legislación Williams, AB831, los distritos están obligados a adoptar y utilizar procedimientos uniformes de quejas para identificar y resolver reclamaciones relacionadas con deficiencias en materiales de instrucción, condiciones de emergencia o urgentes en las instalaciones que representen una amenaza para la salud y seguridad de los estudiantes o el personal, y vacantes o asignaciones incorrectas de docentes. El Superintendent o su designado deberá presentar datos resumidos sobre la naturaleza y resolución de todas las quejas ante la Junta y el Superintendent del Condado de Escuelas de manera trimestral. De conformidad con AB831, el 12 de octubre de 2005, la Junta Escolar de Redwood City aprobó las revisiones a la Política de la Junta 1312.5, Williams Uniform Complaint Procedures Notice to Parents/Guardians: Complaint Rights. La presentación de Informes Trimestrales sobre el Procedimiento Uniforme Williams fue requerida a partir de abril de 2005. El Redwood City School District no ha recibido ninguna queja y continúa cumpliendo con los requisitos al presentar los informes requeridos a la Junta Escolar de Redwood City y al Superintendent del Condado de Escuelas de manera trimestral. No se presentaron quejas en ninguna escuela del distrito durante el trimestre comprendido entre el 1 de julio de 2021 y el 30 de septiembre de 2021. Impacto financiero: Ninguno en este momento. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: Eliana García, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
141:27:17Correspondence
14.1Correspondence
Detalles del punto
§
151:28:49Other Business/Suggested Items For Future Agenda
15.1Possible Other Business/Suggested Items for Future AgendaInformation
161:28:58Board Agenda Calendar
16.1Changes to the Board Agenda ScheduleInformation
Detalles del punto
Justificación: El siguiente Calendario de Puntos para las reuniones de la Junta Escolar 2021-22 (adjunto al presente) ha sido revisado por la administración. Este calendario de puntos de la agenda de la Junta será actualizado de manera rutinaria según sea necesario. Cambios: No se han realizado cambios en este momento. Impacto financiero: Ninguno. Presentado para aprobación. Preparado por: Eliana García, Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent. Aprobado por: John R. Baker, Ed.D., Superintendent §
171:31:16Adjournment
17.1Adjourn the MeetingAction