Regular — June 17, 2026 — RCSD Board Meeting

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractRCTA and CSEA labor association leaders/representatives are invited to speak to the School Board on agenda and non-agenda items. Comments are limited to 3 minutes per person per topic unless otherwise noted.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractThe Bond Program Team is requesting that the School Board approve Change Order #4 with Holt Renewables, LLC. for Kennedy Middle School #2 Phase 2 Solar Project. The proposed change order includes additional scope to install a decomposed granite (DG) pathway and mow curbs associated with the photovoltaic canopy improvements, as well as a deductive adjustment for damaged equipment and materials. The additional work is intended to address project needs identified during construction.

RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve additional scope of work for decomposed granite (DG) path and mow curbs Change Order #4 with Holt Renewables, LLC. for Kennedy Middle School #2 Phase 2 Solar Project.

RationaleDuring construction, the District identified additional improvements that would enhance the functionality, durability, and long-term maintainability of the completed solar installation. The proposed decomposed granite (DG) pathway will replace designated turf areas with a durable walking surface consisting of four inches of base rock and four inches of decomposed granite, improving accessibility throughout the project area while reducing ongoing landscape maintenance requirements. The work also includes the relocation of sprinklers, installation of new DG header boards within the work area, and disposal of excavated materials. In addition, the change order provides for the installation of mow curbs at the photovoltaic canopy columns to create a defined edge condition and protect the integrity of the installation during routine landscape maintenance activities. The change order also includes a deductive adjustment for damaged equipment and materials. Approval of this change order will allow the District to incorporate these enhancements into the project while construction activities remain ongoing.

Financial ImpactThe change order is in the amount of $33,301.80, increasing the total contract to $948,384.92. Funding for this is provided through Budget Source: Fund 40 — Special Reserve Fund for Capital Projects.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractThe Bond Program Team recommends approval of the Measure T Bond Program Tracking List of Items Under $20k. This list provides a summary of recently issued purchase orders that fall within the administrative approval threshold and are presented to the School Board for transparency and oversight.

RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve the attached tracking list of items under $20k.

RationaleThis tracking sheet provides the School Board with all recent items $20k and under in a comprehensive list. This list will be sent to the School Board regularly as POs are compiled.

Financial ImpactTotal for Fiscal Year 2025-26: $15,234.45 Funding for this is provided through Budget Source: Fund 40 — Special Reserve Fund for Capital Projects.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractThe District is moving forward with Phase 3 of its district-wide HVAC upgrades at Roy Cloud and Henry Ford schools. This project will replace outdated systems, add cooling to classrooms and administrative areas, and improve energy efficiency, indoor air quality, and comfort. Quattrocchi Kwok Architects (QKA) has been selected to provide design services, including DSA approval and construction coordination. The upgrades are scheduled for summer 2027 and are funded through Measure S.

RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve the contracts with QKA for the HVAC upgrade projects at Roy Cloud and Henry Ford schools.

RationaleThe Redwood City School District has identified the need to upgrade the HVAC systems district-wide, and the following sites have been approved as Phase 3 of the HVAC upgrades: Roy Cloud and Henry Ford schools. The existing HVAC systems in these schools are outdated, leading to inefficient energy usage, higher maintenance costs, and challenges in maintaining optimal indoor air quality and temperature. In addition to replacing aging equipment, this project will add cooling capabilities to classrooms and administrative areas, addressing the increased demand for climate-controlled environments in our facilities. Project Scope and Objectives: This project aims to: Replace the existing HVAC systems to improve energy efficiency, reliability, and indoor air quality. Add cooling capabilities in classrooms and administrative areas, enhancing comfort for students and staff. Complete all upgrades in compliance with Division of the State Architect (DSA) standards to ensure safety, accessibility, and durability. Prepare the upgraded facilities to meet the needs of current and future students, aligning with the District's goals of maintaining high-quality learning environments. Architectural Services: Architectural services are required to obtain DSA approval and provide a comprehensive, functional design to facilitate the successful design and execution of these projects. The District requested proposals from all architecture firms in the District's approved architecture pool. We received four proposals and QKA has been selected to provide these design services, drawing upon their experience with school HVAC systems and compliance with DSA regulations. The architect’s responsibilities will include initial site assessments, design and engineering, documentation preparation, construction administration, and coordination with DSA for project approvals. Timeline and Budget: Project Completion Date: The HVAC upgrades are scheduled to be completed over the summer of 2027, minimizing disruption to school operations. Preliminary Construction Budget: Initial budget allocations have been set for each school’s project. However, as QKA conducts further site assessments, there may be adjustments to account for any unanticipated requirements or conditions identified. Measure S Funded School Site Construction Estimate Roy Cloud $7,500,000 Henry Ford $7,500,000 Total $15,000,000 25% Soft Costs $3,750,000 Project Total $18,750,000

Financial ImpactSchool Site Design Fee Roy Cloud $571,875 Henry Ford $571,875 TOTAL $1,143,750 This project is funded by Measure S Bond funds.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractOn June 11, 2025, the Board approved the Siemens Building Management Technologies contract for Phase 1 of the HVAC Upgrades Projects in the amount of $1,876,146, funded by Measure S bond proceeds. Phase 1 included HVAC upgrades at Taft, Hoover, Roosevelt, and Adelante Selby Schools. With Phase 1 now substantially complete, the District will issue a final change order for $121,673, bringing the revised total contract value to $1,997,819.

RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve the final change order for Siemens Building Technologies for the HVAC Projects, Phase 1.

RationaleDuring the course of construction, additional scope was required due to unforeseen conditions and to maintain the project schedule. The change orders are broken down below by campus. In summary, the increased scope included Sunday work, additional troubleshooting, extra equipment connections and programming, as well as material changes. School Change Order Amount Adelante Selby $33,276 Hoover $27,655 Roosevelt $40,556 Taft $20,186 TOTAL $121,673 With Phase 1 now substantially complete, the District will issue a final change order in the amount of $121,673, bringing the total revised contract value to $1,997,819.

Financial ImpactThe final change order is in the amount of $121,673, increasing the total contract value to $1,997,819. Funding for this project is provided through the Measure S Bond Fund.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractThe Bond Program Team is requesting approval of the agreement from Carducci Associates to provide landscape architectural services associated with the Roy Cloud School Solar Phase 2 Project. The services were performed to evaluate potential visual mitigation measures in response to concerns regarding the completed solar installation. The scope of work included site evaluations, conceptual design studies, preparation of visual exhibits, coordination with structural consultants, stakeholder meetings, and DSA-related discussions necessary to assess the feasibility and implications of various screening approaches.

RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve the agreement with Carducci Associates for professional landscape architectural services associated with the Roy Cloud School Solar Phase 2 Project.

RationaleFollowing completion of the Roy Cloud School solar installation, concerns were raised regarding the visual impact of the project on adjacent residential properties. Consistent with the District's commitment to being a responsible community partner, the District sought to evaluate potential mitigation measures that could lessen view impacts while preserving the operational functionality of the solar infrastructure. Carducci Associates provided professional landscape architectural services to evaluate potential visual mitigation measures and their feasibility. The scope of work included site evaluations, conceptual design studies, preparation of visual exhibits, coordination with structural consultants, stakeholder meetings, and DSA-related discussions necessary to assess the implications of various screening approaches. The services provided the District with a comprehensive understanding of the opportunities, constraints, and costs associated with potential screening solutions, allowing the District to make informed decisions regarding future mitigation measures.

Financial ImpactThe total for this project is $25,884.35. Funding for this is provided through Budget Source: Fund 40 — Special Reserve Fund for Capital Projects.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractThe Bond Program Team is requesting that the School Board approve the agreement with Carducci Associates for landscape architectural services associated with the Henry Ford School Solar Phase 2 Project. Services included stakeholder consultation, development of conceptual backyard improvement alternatives, evaluation of potential redesign concepts, and preparation of associated cost information to assist the District in assessing potential mitigation measures.

RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve the agreement with Carducci Associates for professional landscape architectural services associated with the Henry Ford School Solar Phase 2 Project.

RationaleFollowing the completion of the Henry Ford solar installation, concerns were raised regarding the visual impact of the project on adjacent residential properties. In keeping with the District's commitment to being a responsible community partner, the District sought to assess potential mitigation measures that could lessen visual impacts while preserving the operational functionality and benefits of the solar infrastructure. Carducci Associates provided professional landscape architectural services to support consultation, develop conceptual backyard improvement alternatives, and coordinate potential redesign solutions, including associated cost considerations. The proposed scope included stakeholder meetings, preparation of conceptual options, and coordination activities necessary to understand the feasibility and implications of various mitigation approaches. The assessment gave the District a clear view of the opportunities for potential solutions.

Financial ImpactThe total for this project is $29,678.48. Funding for this is provided through Budget Source: Fund 40 — Special Reserve Fund for Capital Projects.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractDSA fees are calculated by the California Division of the State Architect (DSA) based on the project's construction valuation and scope of work. Additional fees may be assessed if construction costs increase, project scope changes, or supplemental reviews are required. Payment of these fees is necessary to obtain and maintain DSA approvals for the HVAC Upgrades Project and ensure compliance with California school construction regulations.

RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve the Division of the State Architect (DSA) additional fees for the HVAC Upgrades Projects, Phases 1 & 2.

RationaleThe California Division of the State Architect (DSA) is required to review and approve plans and specifications for public school construction projects to ensure compliance with applicable structural safety, accessibility, fire and life safety, and other state requirements. DSA assesses plan review and inspection fees based on the project's estimated construction cost and the scope of work submitted for approval. For HVAC modernization and replacement projects, DSA fees are calculated using the construction valuation reported at the time of plan submission, which is typically less than the cost when the project is completed. Additional fees may be assessed by DSA when project costs increase beyond the original valuation, when scope changes require additional plan review, when deferred approvals are submitted, or when revised construction documents are processed after the initial approval. These fees are established by state regulation and are not negotiated by the District. Approval of this item authorizes payment of the required DSA fees associated with the HVAC Upgrades Project. Payment of these fees is necessary to maintain DSA review and oversight, obtain project approvals, and ensure the project remains in compliance with California school construction requirements.

Financial ImpactSchool HVAC Phase DSA Fee Received to Date Adelante Selby 1 $16,578.52 Hoover 1 $15,066.67 Roosevelt 1 No fee received as of 6/9/26 Taft 1 No fee received as of 6/9/26 Clifford 2 $26,628.34 Kennedy 2 $40,950.07 Orion 2 $21,981.64 TOTAL $121,205.24 Funding for this project is provided through the Measure S Bond Fund.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractThe Bond Program Team recommends approval of Change Order #2 for the Solar Phase II Project at 3150 Granger Way. This change order reflects the final cost reconciliation for the project's discontinuation and contract closeout.

RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve Change Order #2 to finalize the contract with Holt Renewables, LLC. and account for costs associated with cancellation of the Solar Phase II Project at 3150 Granger Way.

RationaleThe Solar Phase II Project at 3150 Granger Way was canceled following a comprehensive review of project feasibility, site constraints, contractual considerations, and potential alternative approaches. The District, working collaboratively with Cumming Group, the project design team, energy consultant, and legal counsel, conducted extensive due diligence to determine the most appropriate path forward. Alternative solar canopy locations were reviewed to assess whether the project could be relocated while continuing to provide value to the District. This review determined that relocation would require substantial additional infrastructure improvements, including extensive trenching and associated construction costs, making the project financially disadvantageous. After considering the technical, financial, and contractual implications, the District determined that discontinuing the project and proceeding with contract closeout represented the most prudent and cost-effective course of action. Change Order #2 reconciles costs incurred prior to cancellation, including materials, labor, and associated project expenses. The change order represents full and final compensation to Holt Renewables, LLC. for work performed and obligations incurred through the date of termination. Approval of this change order will allow for proper contract closeout and ensure all contractual obligations have been satisfied.

Financial ImpactThe original contract amount of $575,753.00 was previously increased by $4,664.62 through prior approved change orders, resulting in an adjusted contract amount of $580,417.62. Change Order #2 reflects a net decrease of $292,536.96 associated with project cancellation, resulting in a final adjusted contract amount to $287,880.66. To date, $116,559.29 has been paid, with a remaining balance of $171,321.37 owed to Holt Renewables, LLC. This change order represents the final cost reconciliation and contract closeout for the project.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractThe Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) is the district’s three-year strategic plan required under California’s Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF). The LCAP outlines the district’s goals, actions, services, and expenditures designed to improve student outcomes, with a particular focus on English Learners, Foster Youth, Homeless Youth, Low-Income students, and Students with Disabilities. The plan is developed with input from students, families, staff, and the community and serves as a key tool for accountability and continuous improvement.

RationaleThe Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) is a state-required three-year plan that outlines a school district's goals, actions, services, and expenditures to improve student outcomes aligned with both state and local priorities. Embedded within the LCAP is the district’s annual reporting on Local Indicators, which are part of the California School Dashboard accountability system. Local Indicators provide an opportunity for districts to assess and reflect on progress in priority areas that are not measured through state performance indicators. These areas include: Basic Services and Conditions Implementation of State Academic Standards Parent and Family Engagement School Climate Access to a Broad Course of Study Coordination of Services for Expelled Youth Coordination of Services for Foster Youth The Local Indicators reflect the district’s commitment to continuous improvement and provide additional information regarding the implementation of programs, services, and supports that contribute to student success. As required by Education Code §52062, the School Board must hold a public hearing to gather feedback and recommendations from the public regarding the LCAP and related budget prior to final adoption. This public hearing is the final opportunity for stakeholders to provide input into the LCAP before it is presented for approval at the board's regular meeting on June 24, 2026. The LCAP is a critical part of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF). Funds are expected to be principally directed toward the success of English Learners, Foster Youth, Homeless, and Low-Income students. RCSD has engaged parents, educators, employees, union members, students, and the community to update the 2026-2027 LCAP. The LCAP is developed through a series of meetings and an analysis of local data. The final draft of the Annual Update and LCAP were both taken to the LCAP Committee on Feb. 23, 2025, and March 11, 27, and 31, and DELAC for review on February 23, 2026. The attached document contains the following items: LCFF Budget Overview for Parents Supplement to Annual Update for 2024-27 LCAP 2026-2027 LCAP Plan Summary Engaging Educational Partners Goals, Actions, Services Increased or Improved Services Expenditure Tables: 2026-2027 Total Expenditures Table 2026-2027 Contributing Actions Table 2026-2027 Annual Update Table 2026-2027 Contributing Actions Annual Update Table 2026-2027 LCFF Carryover Table 2026-2027 Local Indicator LCAP Instructions Attachments: Local Control and Accountability Plan 2026-2027

Financial ImpactThe total revenue projected for Redwood City Elementary School District is $150,289,231, of which $111,593,230 is Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), $21,479,422 is other state funds, $13,313,053 is local funds, and $3,903,526 is federal funds. Of the $111,593,230 in LCFF Funds, $9,874,917 is generated based on the enrollment of high-need students (foster youth, English learners, and low-income students).

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractEducation Code requires the Governing Board to hold a public hearing on the 2026-27 Proposed Budget before adoption. The proposed budget has been available for public inspection and includes projected revenues, expenditures, LCAP-related expenditures, and required reserve disclosures. Following the public hearing, the Board is scheduled to consider adoption of the budget at its June 24, 2026, meeting.

RationaleEducation Code Sections 42103, 42122, and 42127 require the Governing Board of each school district to hold a public hearing on the proposed budget prior to its adoption. The hearing must occur no later than three working days after the proposed budget is made available for public inspection and provides an opportunity for district residents to comment on or object to any portion of the proposed budget. The Redwood City School District's 2026-27 Proposed Budget was available for public inspection starting June 12, 2026, during regular business hours. The proposed budget includes estimated revenues and expenditures for the 2026-27 fiscal year, projected fund balances, multi-year financial projections, and expenditures necessary to implement the District's Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP). In accordance with state requirements, the budget also includes a statement supporting any assigned and unassigned fund balances that exceed the state-recommended minimum reserve level. The Governing Board may not adopt the budget until after the public hearing has been conducted. The Board is scheduled to consider adoption of the 2026-27 Proposed Budget at its June 24, 2026, meeting. Note: The presentation associated with the 2026–27 Proposed Budget Public Hearing will be posted and available for public review by 5:00 p.m. on June 14, 2026.

Financial ImpactThe District projects General Fund revenues of $150,289,231 and expenditures of $151,272,528. The projected General Fund ending fund balance at the close of the 2026-27 fiscal year is $11,765,180.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the May 13 Minutes for the Regular Meeting, as submitted.

RationaleThe board meeting minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, Superintendent, and the Administration.

Financial ImpactNone.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractThis amendment is to increase the total contracted amount to align with the new funding received through the After School Education and Safety Grant (ASES).

RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the amendment to the agreement between the Redwood City School District and Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula for Summer 2025 and 2025-2026 School Year.

RationaleThe previous contract was approved on June 25, 2025, for a total amount of $2,000,000.00. The increased amount for this amendment is $406.96, which would bring the amended contract total amount to $2,000,406.96 upon School Board approval on June 17, 2026. The original agreement was made between the Redwood City School District and Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula to provide expanded after-school programming. This amendment aims to align the total contracted amount originally agreed upon to the new funding received through the After School Education and Safety Grant (ASES) 2025-2026 fiscal year.

Financial ImpactThe contract will increase by $406.96, bringing the total contract amount to $2,000,406.96. The funding will come directly from the After School Education and Safety Grant (ASES) with no financial impact on RCSD general or concentrated funds. The school district is the fiscal agent for the grant.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the School Board approve the attached interagency agreements to provide education and training to credential candidates and student interns.

RationaleThis agreement is between the Redwood City School District and Santa Clara University. These agreements describe and confirm the expectations and responsibilities regarding traditional clinical practice through which university students enrolled in credentialing and internship programs will gain experience in the public school setting.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractThese funds support schools in strengthening core academic skills, attracting and retaining quality teachers, enhancing arts and music programs, and updating classroom technology.

RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the proposed expenditures from Measure U for the 2026-2027 school year as detailed in the attachment.

RationaleIn the 2026–2027 school year, each school will receive a baseline amount of $17,000, plus approximately $226 per student. Each school's Site Council, which includes the principal, teachers, and elected parent representatives, met to develop a proposal for use of their site's allocated Measure U funds that complies with the Measure U guidelines: Enhance Reading, Writing, Math, and Science Skills Attract and Retain Qualified Teachers Enhance Quality Arts and Music Programs Update Classroom Computers and Instructional Technology The Citizens Oversight Committee will be responsible for ensuring that all expenditures of funds comply with the language stated in the ballot.

Financial ImpactReduction to General and Categorical funds to be determined.

Item details

Quick Summary / AbstractRocketship Redwood City Prep is submitting the 2026-2027 Application for the Use of Measure U Funds to the Redwood City School District for school board approval.

RecommendationRocketship Redwood City Charter's Administration recommends that the RCSD School Board approve the proposed Measure U expenditures for the 2026-2027 school year, as detailed in the attachment.

RationaleRocketship Redwood City Prep is submitting the 2026-2027 Application for the Use of Measure U Funds to the Redwood City School District for school board approval. The detailed plan for the funds is outlined in the attached application, and is aligned with voter-approved priorities outlined in the measure. Rocketship Redwood City will be using the Measure U funds to purchase student and staff computer equipment, retain and attract qualified teachers through stipends and maintaining two Teacher Assistants, and provide science-focused field trips and hands-on learning for our students. We thank the RCSD Board of Trustees and district staff for your assistance in securing these funds for our Redwood City students.

Financial ImpactReduces the amount of general funds used towards these programs.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 0000: Vision

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 0100: Philosophy

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 0200: Goals For The School District

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 2120: Superintendent Recruitment And Selection

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 2121: Superintendent's Contract

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 2210: Administrative Discretion Regarding Board Policy

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9005: Governance Standards

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9011: Disclosure Of Confidential/Privileged Information

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy Bylaw 9012: Board Member Electronic Communications

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9110: Terms Of Office

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9121: President

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9123: Clerk

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9124: Attorney

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board PolicyBylaw 9130: Board Committees

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9140: Board Representatives

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9220: Governing Board Elections

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9222: Resignation

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9224: Oath Or Affirmation

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9230: Orientation

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9240: Board Training.

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9260: Legal Protection

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9270: Conflict Of Interest

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9310: Board Policies

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9320.1: Remote Meetings and Attendance

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9321: Closed Session

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9322: Agenda/Meeting Materials

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9323: Meeting Conduct

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9323.2: Actions By The Board

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration’s recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9400: Board Self-Evaluation

RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.

Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.

Item details

RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the attached revised Management Salary Schedule, effective June 18, 2026, to add the position of Executive Director.

RationaleThis position will give an opportunity for Principals and Directors to be considered for Executive Director moving forward in salary advancement.

Financial ImpactThe addition of the Executive Director classification to the salary schedule does not, by itself, create a new budgetary obligation. Any future staffing costs associated with this classification will be incorporated into the District's adopted budget and approved through the annual budget development process or subsequent Board action, as applicable.